Accuracy of radiographic and protrusive occlusal record methods in determining condylar guidance angles: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Luke, Alexander Maniangat; Kuriadom, Sam Thomas; George, Jeny Mary; Wahjuningrum, Dian Agustin

doi:10.12688/f1000research.75347.1

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 37 publications

(178 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…(9) However, the limitations of CBCT include the high cost of the equipment. (10,11) Most of the studies used panoramic imaging and lateral cephalograms for recording HCGA. (2) There are very few studies comparing clinical and radiographic procedures employing CBCT.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative Evaluation Of Clinical And Radiographic Horizontal Condylar Guidance Angle Values By Using Two Different Interocclusal Recording Materials In Dentulous Patients

Uttaradi¹,

Kadiyala²,

Surapaneni³

et al. 2022

Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: The success of prosthodontic procedures can be accurately determined by the exact replication of the patient’s condylar path using a semi-adjustable articulator. It allows the clinician to determine the morphology of the occlusal surfaces in relation to the condylar pathway during mandibular movements. If condylar guidance is not exactly registered, it might result in occlusal interferences during movements of the mandible and lengthen chairside adjustment time, which is inconvenient for the patient and dentist.Materials and methods: A total of 20 dentulous patients from 20 to 30 years of age group attending the department of prosthodontics at Sibar institute of dental sciences were selected for the study. Alu wax and jet bite were used to obtain the protrusive interocclusal record (PIR). Protrusive records were then used to program the semi-adjustable articulator to obtain HCGA values on both sides. Using the same protrusive records CBCT radiograph was taken. Radiographic images were traced on tracing paper and HCGA values were measured using Frankfort’s horizontal reference line (the line connecting porion and orbitale) and the mean curvature line (most-superior and most-inferior points of the curvatures) on both sides using a protractor. The data were analyzed by paired sample t-tests and Pearson’s correlation tests.Results: There was no significant difference between the right and left sides in the clinical and radiographic methods using Alu wax PIR. In the clinical method utilizing jet bite PIR, the right side had significantly higher HCGA values than on the left side. On CBCT, no such differences were found.Conclusion: CBCT horizontal condylar guidance angle values were higher than those obtained using the clinical method by using both records. Values obtained from both the methods, i.e., protrusive interocclusal record and cone-beam computed tomography, were compared and correlated.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative Evaluation Of Clinical And Radiographic Horizontal Condylar Guidance Angle Values By Using Two Different Interocclusal Recording Materials In Dentulous Patients

Uttaradi¹,

Kadiyala²,

Surapaneni³

et al. 2022

Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Evaluation of accuracy between extraoral Gothic arch tracing and various other methods assessing horizontal condylar guidance angle in completely edentulous patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Potdukhe,

Iyer,

Nadgere

2023

The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the accuracy of different methods of measuring horizontal condylar guidance (HCG) angle in comparison with extraoral Gothic arch tracing for completely edentulous patients. Settings and Design: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Materials and Methods: Two reviewers searched the EBSCOhost, Cochrane Library, and PubMed/MEDLINE databases and the Google Scholar search engine for in vivo studies, randomized controlled trials, cross-sectional studies, and quasi-experimental studies published from January 2005 to December 2022 on various other methods of determining HCG angle in completely edentulous patients compared with extraoral Gothic arch tracing method. Statistical Analysis Used: Meta-analysis was conducted from the reported quantitative data. Results: A total of 513 articles were obtained from different electronic databases, of which 22 studies were included for qualitative synthesis and 20 studies were included for meta-analysis. For the right side, a statistically significant difference was observed for panoramic radiograph (P < 0.05, pooled mean difference = 5.08 [2.17, 7]) and cephalogram (P < 0.05, pooled mean difference = 10.65 [8.81, 12.49]), whereas no statistically significant difference was observed for cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) (P = 0.41, pooled mean difference = 4.39 [−6.10, 14.87]) and protrusive interocclusal wax record (P = 0.92, pooled mean difference = −0.45 [−9.62, 8.72]) as compared with extraoral Gothic arch tracing method. For the left side, a statistically significant difference was observed for panoramic radiograph (P < 0.05, pooled mean difference = 5.07 [1.95, 8.18]) and cephalogram (P < 0.05, pooled mean difference = 10.24 [8.65, 11.83]), whereas no statistically significant difference was observed for CBCT (P = 0.31, pooled mean difference = 4.05 [−3.74, 11.84]) and protrusive interocclusal wax record (P = 0.72, pooled mean difference = −1.21 [−7.86, 5.43]) as compared with extraoral Gothic arch tracing method. Conclusion: The cephalogram and panoramic radiograph obtained higher HCG angles in completely edentulous patients than extraoral Gothic arch tracing.

show abstract

A systematic review and meta-analysis of accuracy between protrusive interocclusal record and horizontal condylar guidance angle recording methods in dentulous patients

Potdukhe,

Iyer,

Nadgere

2024

The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the accuracy of different methods used for measuring horizontal condylar guidance (HCG) angle in comparison with protrusive interocclusal record (IOR) for dentulous patients. Settings and Design: The design involves systematic review and meta-analysis following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis guidelines. Materials and Methods: An electronic search was carried out by two reviewers in the Google Scholar search engine and the EBSCO host, Cochrane Library, and PubMed/MEDLINE databases for quasi-experimental studies, in vivo studies, and cross-sectional studies published from January 2005 to February 2023 determining the HCG angle in dentulous patients. Statistical Analysis Used: Meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the quantitative data. Results: A total of 577 articles were identified, 29 analytical cross-sectional studies that fulfilled the eligibility criteria were included for qualitative synthesis and 26 studies were included for meta-analysis. A statistically significant difference was observed for the right and left HCG angles obtained by the panoramic radiograph method and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) method and for the right side HCG angle obtained by cephalogram method showing higher values than the protrusive IOR method. No statistically significant difference was observed for the left side HCG angle obtained by the cephalogram method and both the right and left side HCG angles obtained by the intraoral tracer method. Conclusions: The panoramic radiograph, cephalogram, and CBCT obtained higher HCG angles in dentulous patients than the protrusive IOR method.

show abstract

Accuracy of radiographic and protrusive occlusal record methods in determining condylar guidance angles: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Cited by 3 publications

References 37 publications

Comparative Evaluation Of Clinical And Radiographic Horizontal Condylar Guidance Angle Values By Using Two Different Interocclusal Recording Materials In Dentulous Patients

Comparative Evaluation Of Clinical And Radiographic Horizontal Condylar Guidance Angle Values By Using Two Different Interocclusal Recording Materials In Dentulous Patients

Evaluation of accuracy between extraoral Gothic arch tracing and various other methods assessing horizontal condylar guidance angle in completely edentulous patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

A systematic review and meta-analysis of accuracy between protrusive interocclusal record and horizontal condylar guidance angle recording methods in dentulous patients

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About