2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2008.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of retrospective memory and covariation estimation in patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
39
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
6
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the measure of avoidance was based on retrospective reports covering the period between the baseline and follow-up interview. Nonetheless, retrospective reports of anxiety symptoms have been shown to be fairly accurate in past studies [75, 76]. Second, there may be differences in the effect of the moderating role of avoidance behavior for singular social and specific situations, such as public speaking or animals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the measure of avoidance was based on retrospective reports covering the period between the baseline and follow-up interview. Nonetheless, retrospective reports of anxiety symptoms have been shown to be fairly accurate in past studies [75, 76]. Second, there may be differences in the effect of the moderating role of avoidance behavior for singular social and specific situations, such as public speaking or animals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, when we do not feel well, we may make greater relational attribution to sleep disturbance than actually deserved. For example, people with obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) shows high accuracy in recalling their OCD symptoms but tend to overestimate the relationship between those symptoms and sleep 39. One way to rule this out is to better understand the relationship between objectively obtained sleep quality and FMS symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EMA does not rely on measurements using memory recall within the clinical setting, but rather allows for collection of information about the client's experiences in their natural setting, potentially improving the assessment's ecological validity (Stone and Shiffman, 2002). In situ sampling techniques have been successfully used in psychology, psychiatry, and occupational therapy (for a more detailed account see research by Morgan et al, 1990; de Beurs et al, 1992; Kamarack et al, 1998; Litt et al, 1998; Kimhy et al, 2006; Gloster et al, 2008; Putnam and McSweeney, 2008; Trull et al, 2008). Generally it is agreed that EMA offers broader assessment within the client's natural environment, as it includes random time sampling of the client's experience, recording of events associated with the client's experience, and self-reports regarding the client's behaviors and physiological experiences (Stone and Shiffman, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%