2000
DOI: 10.1002/1098-108x(200101)29:1<29::aid-eat5>3.0.co;2-e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of self-reported weight in patients with binge eating disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, use of self-reported height and weight are based on self-report might have introduced some bias into the results. It appears common for individuals to underestimate their weight and overestimate their height (Shields, Gorber, & Tremblay, 2008), and there are some reports suggesting systematic errors (e.g., women under-report more than men and misreport is associated with greater BMI) (Masheb & Grilo, 2001; Villanueva, 2001). Thus, use of objective measures would be preferred, although this may not be practical or feasible in large population-based studies such as the NESARC, obtaining objective measures may be impractical.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, use of self-reported height and weight are based on self-report might have introduced some bias into the results. It appears common for individuals to underestimate their weight and overestimate their height (Shields, Gorber, & Tremblay, 2008), and there are some reports suggesting systematic errors (e.g., women under-report more than men and misreport is associated with greater BMI) (Masheb & Grilo, 2001; Villanueva, 2001). Thus, use of objective measures would be preferred, although this may not be practical or feasible in large population-based studies such as the NESARC, obtaining objective measures may be impractical.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since selfreported and measured weights correlate as highly as 0.98-0.995 in weight treatment-seeking samples (with r ÂŒ 0.96 for men and r ÂŒ 0.98 for women in the current sample), and since self-reported weight is the strongest predictor of measured weight, we are confident that our weight change variables are a reasonably accurate assessment of relative weight change. [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46] Indeed, some research has suggested that self-reports of weight, with coefficients as high as 0.97 in predicting actual weight, may be considered more reliable and valid than self-reports of less objective characteristics such as attitudes or health status. 45 Researchers agree that self-reported weights are extremely accurate indicators of actual weight that are particularly useful in cases when data are reported by telephone or by mail, as was the case at 6 and 12 months in the current study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Body weight was self-reported. Masheb and Grilo (2001) found that the correlation between selfreported and actual body weight was very high for obese adults with BED (r 0/.99). BMI was calculated by dividing weight in kilograms by height in meters squared.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%