2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-03206-1_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of Surrogate Solutions of Integral Equations by Feedforward Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An important practical test of correctness, intended to distinguish a neural network that merely fits a few Gaussians to the data set from a network that is a Fredholm solver, would be to present a DEER trace with four distances to a network that was trained on a database with at most three. A network that has learned to be a Fredholm solver in the sense discussed in ( 51 , 52 , 54 , 55 , 57 ) should still return the right answer. As Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An important practical test of correctness, intended to distinguish a neural network that merely fits a few Gaussians to the data set from a network that is a Fredholm solver, would be to present a DEER trace with four distances to a network that was trained on a database with at most three. A network that has learned to be a Fredholm solver in the sense discussed in ( 51 , 52 , 54 , 55 , 57 ) should still return the right answer. As Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At a more general level, neural network “surrogate” solutions to Fredholm equations are well researched in their own right ( 51 ), with rigorous accuracy bounds available ( 52 , 53 ). In 2013, Jafarian and Nia ( 54 ) proposed a two-layer feedback network built around a Taylor expansion of the solution; Effati and Buzhabadi ( 55 ) published a feedforward network proposition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%