2004
DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000114831.59185.02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of the double indicator method for measurement of extravascular lung water depends on the type of acute lung injury*

Abstract: The double indicator method is useful for evaluation of pulmonary edema in indirect lung injury, as induced by oleic acid, but produces misleading values in direct lung injury, as produced by hydrochloric instillation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
1
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
35
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean basal EVLW was increased when compared to other reports (31,32). One of the reasons could be due to the age of the piglets (12 to 72 h) in the present study.…”
Section: Methodological Validation For the Assessment Of Evlwcontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…The mean basal EVLW was increased when compared to other reports (31,32). One of the reasons could be due to the age of the piglets (12 to 72 h) in the present study.…”
Section: Methodological Validation For the Assessment Of Evlwcontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…This accumulation, which is detectable as a body weight gain and as a gradual increase in global end-diastolic volume, can induce pulmonary edema, i.e., an abnormal accumulation of fluid in the extravascular compartments of the lung [23] . We found that the extravascular lung water measured using the transpulmonary thermodilution technique correlates significantly with the respiratory index as an indicator of the respiratory function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The widely adopted dose of OA falls in the range of 0.06-0.15 ml/kg, which is mixed thoroughly with 15-20 ml of normal saline solution and injected slowly within 20-30 min [6,[26][27][28][29] , targeting a PaO 2 / FIO 2 ratio of 80-120 mm Hg. Sometimes a dose as small as 0.01 ml/kg [30] is used to produce a very slight lung injury or a dose as high as 0.3 ml/kg [31] is applied to achieve a quite severe lung injury.…”
Section: Oai Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%