2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2008.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of the volume-viscosity swallow test for clinical screening of oropharyngeal dysphagia and aspiration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

13
312
2
40

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 389 publications
(381 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
13
312
2
40
Order By: Relevance
“…Several screening and clinical assessment protocols for oropharyngeal dysphagia can be found In the current literature; however, the vast majority of studies are in post-stroke individuals [14][15][16][17][18] . As a consequence, we have not found studies on accuracy of clinical assessment of dysphagia in a population similar to this study, as the studies on oropharynge dysphagia in CP, in the most part, characterizes the profile of swallowing in this population 19 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several screening and clinical assessment protocols for oropharyngeal dysphagia can be found In the current literature; however, the vast majority of studies are in post-stroke individuals [14][15][16][17][18] . As a consequence, we have not found studies on accuracy of clinical assessment of dysphagia in a population similar to this study, as the studies on oropharynge dysphagia in CP, in the most part, characterizes the profile of swallowing in this population 19 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The water-swallowing test was scored one for inability to swallow through to five for complete swallowing. Similarly, in the food-swallowing test, severe food aspiration was scored as one, with relative scores up to five, which was scored when there was no sings of aspiration: cough or voice changes or both were considered signs of potential aspiration [16,17]. Besides, during the repetitive saliva-swallowing test, the number of swallows was recorded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The V-VST is a bedside clinical method which uses different volumes (5, 10, or 20 mL) and viscosities (nectar, liquid, and pudding) administered in a progression of increasing difficulty to protect the patient from aspirations. It combines the use of pulsioximetry to detect silent aspirations and is easy, cheap, and reliable (88.2 % sensitivity for impaired safety, 100 % sensitivity for aspirations, and 64.7 % specificity) [20]. If OD is diagnosed as severe, a second evaluation with videofluoroscopy, the gold standard, is performed using the same progression of boluses as were used in the V-VST, to assess swallowing alterations.…”
Section: Therapeutic Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intervention protocol is being introduced into the main hospital units treating elderly patients at risk of OD (geriatric and neurological units). This intervention consists of screening for OD using the V-VST [20] on admission and discharge, evaluating nutritional status using the MNA-SF [21] and assessing oral health and oral hygiene status with the OHI-S [22] and the presence of periodontal diseases and dental caries. The V-VST is a bedside clinical method which uses different volumes (5, 10, or 20 mL) and viscosities (nectar, liquid, and pudding) administered in a progression of increasing difficulty to protect the patient from aspirations.…”
Section: Therapeutic Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%