2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2019.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of Tumor Size Measurements Performed by Magnetic Resonance, Ultrasound and Mammography, and Their Correlation With Pathological Size in Primary Breast Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although CE-MRI exhibits higher sensitivity than mammography in the detection of DCIS, 13 calcifications in CE-MRI cannot be directly visualized, as only the active part of the tumor takes up contrast media; as a consequence, the concomitant evaluation of mammography is frequently performed to depict a possible peritumoral DCIS. Our results point out that the measured size of the contrast enhancing part of the tumor has a strong and significant correlation to the after measured size of the invasive component in the histological workup similar to MRI studies, where in clinical practice the tumor previously of surgery is measured to have an approximate idea of how much tissue has to be removed 14,15 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although CE-MRI exhibits higher sensitivity than mammography in the detection of DCIS, 13 calcifications in CE-MRI cannot be directly visualized, as only the active part of the tumor takes up contrast media; as a consequence, the concomitant evaluation of mammography is frequently performed to depict a possible peritumoral DCIS. Our results point out that the measured size of the contrast enhancing part of the tumor has a strong and significant correlation to the after measured size of the invasive component in the histological workup similar to MRI studies, where in clinical practice the tumor previously of surgery is measured to have an approximate idea of how much tissue has to be removed 14,15 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…in clinical practice the tumor previously of surgery is measured to have an approximate idea of how much tissue has to be removed. 14,15 In most of the cases, also the size of the peritumoral DCIS measured in B-CT correlated strong with the size afterward measured in the histological workup. Nevertheless, in our small cohort, the values showed to be not significant as some of the peritumoral DCIS did not have perifocal microcalcifications in B-CT, which could have indicated its presence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used for the diagnosis, therapy planning and follow-up of UM [7] , [15] , [16] , [17] , [18] , [19] , [20] . Various studies suggest that MRI’s 3D tumour visualisation and better tissue contrast might be beneficial in determining UM tumour dimensions compared to conventional 2D ultrasound, corresponding to findings in other malignancies [16] , [17] , [18] , [19] , [20] , [21] , [22] , [23] , [24] . Nevertheless, several uncertainties in MR-based dimensions measurements for ocular tumours remain that hinder broader application of MRI in ocular radiotherapy planning, for example regarding the optimal method to measure in 3D and the differences related to the various MRI contrasts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding is important because this information affects the T feature of TNM classification and consequently changes therapeutic management. ( 22 )…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%