2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.12.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of two commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for the detection of antibodies to Salmonella spp. in slaughter pigs from Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
11
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Farzan and others (2007) described a significant disagreement at pig level between the latter two ELI SAs (kappa 0.56). In another publication, when HerdChek, with a cutoff OD value of 10 per cent, was compared with an ELI SA test not included in this study (Svanovir [Svanova Biotech]), there was moderate agreement (kappa 0.41) (Mainar-Jaime and others 2008). An international ring trial (in which a set of samples are sent to a number of laboratories for independent analysis and comparison) for porcine Salmonella ELI SAs was carried out in 2001 involving 12 laboratories using ‘in-house’ ELISAs or commercially available kits to test a set of 47 reference serum samples (van der Heijden and others 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, Farzan and others (2007) described a significant disagreement at pig level between the latter two ELI SAs (kappa 0.56). In another publication, when HerdChek, with a cutoff OD value of 10 per cent, was compared with an ELI SA test not included in this study (Svanovir [Svanova Biotech]), there was moderate agreement (kappa 0.41) (Mainar-Jaime and others 2008). An international ring trial (in which a set of samples are sent to a number of laboratories for independent analysis and comparison) for porcine Salmonella ELI SAs was carried out in 2001 involving 12 laboratories using ‘in-house’ ELISAs or commercially available kits to test a set of 47 reference serum samples (van der Heijden and others 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Differences could also be due to the lack of agreement showed between serology and microbiology at the pig level, especially when cut-off values of 10% or 20% were used (Nollet et al, 2005;Farzan et al, 2007;Mainar-Jaime et al, 2008b). We used a higher cut-off value (OD%≥40) that might not improve overall diagnostic accuracy but allowed higher confidence with regard to test specificity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…com/pubwebresources/pdf/en_us/livestock-poultry/ swine-salmonella-ab-test-sheet.pdf), test's sensitivity and specificity on field samples were estimated as 73% and 95%, respectively, in an independent study (Mainar-Jaime et al, 2008b). Nevertheless, in order to minimize the number of false-positive individual results a cut-off value OD% ≥ 40% (equivalent to a S/P ≥ 1) was used to deem an animal as positive.…”
Section: Serologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…; Mainar‐Jaime et al . ,b; Vico et al . ), high standards on farm biosecurity and hygiene are of utmost importance to prevent the contact of this pathogen with the live pig (De Busser et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%