2001
DOI: 10.1364/josaa.18.000241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of velocity estimation by Reichardt correlators

Abstract: Although a great deal of experimental evidence supports the notion of a Reichardt correlator as a mechanism for biological motion detection, the correlator does not signal true image velocity. This study examines the accuracy with which realistic Reichardt correlators can provide velocity estimates in an organism's natural visual environment. The predictable statistics of natural images imply a consistent correspondence between mean correlator response and velocity, allowing the otherwise ambiguous Reichardt c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
169
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
12
169
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The spatial power spectra of luminance along one-dimensional paths in natural images follow an approximate 1/f characteristic, where f is spatial frequency (Dror et al, 2001;van Hateren, 1997). In addition to similarity between different scenes, this characteristic implies a certain self-similarity of natural imagery at different spatial scales (i.e., at different ranges from the eye), and it leads to a corresponding consistency in the response of the correlational EMD model: velocity tuning curves (mean output versus velocity of optic flow) obtained with different moving natural images tend to be very similar in shape (Dror et al, 2001; see also Fig. 7 below).…”
Section: Velocity Constancymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The spatial power spectra of luminance along one-dimensional paths in natural images follow an approximate 1/f characteristic, where f is spatial frequency (Dror et al, 2001;van Hateren, 1997). In addition to similarity between different scenes, this characteristic implies a certain self-similarity of natural imagery at different spatial scales (i.e., at different ranges from the eye), and it leads to a corresponding consistency in the response of the correlational EMD model: velocity tuning curves (mean output versus velocity of optic flow) obtained with different moving natural images tend to be very similar in shape (Dror et al, 2001; see also Fig. 7 below).…”
Section: Velocity Constancymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saturating nonlinearities have been included as elaborations in the correlational model for motion detection, and have been shown to improve reliability of velocity estimation (Dror et al, 2001).…”
Section: Velocity Constancymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because: (1) natural stimuli are characterized by a wide range of spatial frequencies, in contrast to conventional grating patterns (see also Ref. [60]); (2) the local-movement inputs of the TCs operate in a range where velocity is no longer represented linearly; and (3) the nonlinear spatialintegration characteristics of TCs (see Box 1) make their responses largely independent of texture density.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Behaviourally Generated Optic Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that the responses of the correlation type motion detector and of the postsynaptic neurons integrating their responses strongly depend on the textural properties of a moving pattern (Buchner 1984;Dror et al 2001;Eckert and Hamdorf 1981). To test whether the wall avoidance behaviour of the saccadic controller is robust against changes in texture, we tested the system for different wall textures.…”
Section: Dependence On the Wall Texturementioning
confidence: 99%