1999
DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2401566
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate and rapid analysis of residual disease in patients with CML using specific fluorescent hybridization probes for real time quantitative RT-PCR

Abstract: We sought to establish a rapid and reliable RT-PCR approach for detection and quantification of BCR-ABL fusion transcripts using the LightCycler technology. This device combines rapid thermocycling with online detection of PCR product formation and is based on the fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) between two adjacent hybridization probes carrying donor and acceptor fluorophores. A pair of probes was designed that was complementary to ABL exon 3, thus enabling detection of all known BCR-ABL variant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
169
1
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 236 publications
(175 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
169
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a low number of copies cannot be identified with RT-PCR. Of note, the presence of cDNA was verified in all samples using G6PD as a reporter gene [8], even in samples where LHR splice variants were not detected through RT-PCR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Such a low number of copies cannot be identified with RT-PCR. Of note, the presence of cDNA was verified in all samples using G6PD as a reporter gene [8], even in samples where LHR splice variants were not detected through RT-PCR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The expressions of BCR-ABL and total ABL were determined by quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction from peripheral blood samples 14 and standardized according to the international scale (BCR-ABL IS ). [18][19][20] Only patients expressing typical BCR-ABL transcripts (b2a2, b3a2 or both b2a2 and b3a2) and monitored in standardized labs were considered. Patients with atypical transcripts (e1a2, n ¼ 3; b2a3, n ¼ 3; b3a3, n ¼ 3; b2a3 and b3a3, n ¼ 2; e19a2, n ¼ 10), unknown transcripts or monitored in nonstandardized labs (n ¼ 52) were excluded from the analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 BCR-ABL and beta-glucuronidase (GUS) transcripts were quantified as described previously. 8 Importantly, for the current study, mutations were considered to be significant only if detected by two independent methods (D-HPLC/DS, ARMS or L-PCR). Findings from only one method were excluded from further analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%