2009
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2008.2010048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate Bit-Error-Rate Analysis of Bandlimited Cooperative OSTBC Networks Under Timing Synchronization Errors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned above, LS codes are employed as our DS-CDMA spreading codes, where the source nodes have the LS codes of LS(NLS, PLS, W0) = LS (8,4,7), while the relay nodes employ LS(NLS, PLS, W0) = LS (8,16,7), indicating that the corresponding width of the IFW is 7Tc. For instance, assuming that the system has a chip rate of 1.2288 Mchips/sec, the width of the IFW becomes 7Tc = 5.7 µs.…”
Section: Performance and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As mentioned above, LS codes are employed as our DS-CDMA spreading codes, where the source nodes have the LS codes of LS(NLS, PLS, W0) = LS (8,4,7), while the relay nodes employ LS(NLS, PLS, W0) = LS (8,16,7), indicating that the corresponding width of the IFW is 7Tc. For instance, assuming that the system has a chip rate of 1.2288 Mchips/sec, the width of the IFW becomes 7Tc = 5.7 µs.…”
Section: Performance and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aforementioned cooperative STCs are all based on the assumption of perfect timing synchronization between the relay nodes, although in practice it is difficult to acquire accurate symbol-level time synchronization without imposing a high additional synchronization overhead and implementation complexity. As noted in [7], the resultant time synchronization errors impose a significant performance degradation. Additionally, the propagation delays arising both from the different node locations and from the multipath-induced delay-spread also contribute to the sampling offset errors, which further aggravates the effect of synchronization errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, due to the above-mentioned constraint of imposing a sparse structure on the dispersion matrices of our cooperative Asynchronous STSK (ASTSK) scheme, only a single RN is activated within each symbol duration, hence exhibiting robustness against IRS errors provided that they are limited to a fraction of the symbolduration. We note that the potential IRS error may severely degrade the performance of conventional cooperative STCs, which require symbol-level IRS, as investigated in [3]. On the other hand, when the IRS error exceeds the symbol duration, a severe impairment may be imposed also on our cooperative ASTSK scheme, since the structure of the STSK codeword is destroyed.…”
Section: B Relay Modelmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Most of the previously-proposed cooperative STCs assumed perfect Inter-Relay Synchronization (IRS), although it is a challenging task to acquire symbol-level timing synchronization between the distributed Relay Nodes (RNs). However, as noted in [3], the asynchronous transmissions of the RNs may destroy the STC's orthogonality, leading to a severe performance degradation. For the sake of effectively combating this IRS problem, a number of asynchronous cooperative STCs were proposed in [4], [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the resultant time synchronization errors impose a significant performance degradation as noted in [4], asynchronous cooperation schemes were investigated in [5], [6], under the assumption of having perfect CSI and/or delay information at the destination node. More recently, a CDSTC scheme was proposed for realistic asynchronous relay networks in [7] with the aid of interference rejection spreading codes, namely…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%