2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.theochem.2010.08.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate calculation of C1s core electron binding energies of some carbon hydrates and substituted benzenes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, whereas more than 20 of the DFT functionals considered here display average absolute deviations of 45 meV or better, the maximum absolute deviation does not drop below 200 meV. The largest errors in our study were found for 1,3-difluorobenzene, 1,3-pentadiene, and 1-butyne, of which the latter was not included in ref .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 49%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In fact, whereas more than 20 of the DFT functionals considered here display average absolute deviations of 45 meV or better, the maximum absolute deviation does not drop below 200 meV. The largest errors in our study were found for 1,3-difluorobenzene, 1,3-pentadiene, and 1-butyne, of which the latter was not included in ref .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…As applied to shifts in 89 adiabatic C1s energies in F- and CH 3 -substituted benzenes (relative to benzene), their favored approach gave an average absolute deviation (AAD) from the experimental values of 0.039 eV, which is marginally better than for the B3LYP/ECP approach described above (0.041 eV). The deviation was found to increase somewhat, to an AAD = 0.056 eV, as the chemical diversity was increased . This data set is still heavily biased however with 70% of the entries referring to F- and CH 3 -substituted benzenes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is therefore highly desirable to also calculate absolute core-electron binding energies, but these are often found to differ by multiple electron volts from measured values. Some works have reported the prediction of accurate absolute core-electron binding energies , [20,[24][25][26] but this typically relies on the fortuitous cancellation of errors arising from incomplete basis sets, limitations in the treatment of exchange and correlation effects and the neglect or empirical treatment of relativistic effects [18]. The reliance on error cancellations ultimately limits the generality and the accuracy of these methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%