2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00894-014-2393-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate calculation of the ionization energies of the chlorine lone pairs in 1,1,1-trifluoro-2-chloroethane (HCFC-133a)

Abstract: The vertical ionization energies of the chlorine lone pairs in HCFC-133a have been calculated at the SCF (via Koopmans' theorem and including orbital relaxation) and correlated (ROMP2, OVGF, and ROCCSD(T)) levels. Dunning aug-cc-pVXZ (X = D, T, and Q) basis sets were employed, and the ROMP2 and ROCCSD(T) results were extrapolated to the complete basis set (CBS) limit. Our highest-level results (obtained at the ROCCSD(T)/CBS level) were 11.99 and 12.08 eV for the Cl lone pairs of A″ and A' symmetry, respectivel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The energy differences between the A′ and A″ states arising from the same configuration (and involving excitation from the n orbitals) are in the range from 0.07 to 0.15 eV, and are compatible with the difference of 0.09 eV between the ionization potentials of the n 1 and n 2 lone pairs computed at the ROCCSD(T)/CBS level. 50 As can also be seen from Table 2, the ⟨r 2 ⟩ values lead to a clear separation between the valence (105 a 0 2 ) and Rydberg (132−159 a 0 2 ) states, although the ⟨r 2 ⟩ values for the nσ* states are significantly larger than that of the ground state (88 a 0…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The energy differences between the A′ and A″ states arising from the same configuration (and involving excitation from the n orbitals) are in the range from 0.07 to 0.15 eV, and are compatible with the difference of 0.09 eV between the ionization potentials of the n 1 and n 2 lone pairs computed at the ROCCSD(T)/CBS level. 50 As can also be seen from Table 2, the ⟨r 2 ⟩ values lead to a clear separation between the valence (105 a 0 2 ) and Rydberg (132−159 a 0 2 ) states, although the ⟨r 2 ⟩ values for the nσ* states are significantly larger than that of the ground state (88 a 0…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…44 It is important to mention that the accuracy of such predictions depends on the absence of Rydberg-valence mixing. 16 As these orbitals (and the associated congurations) can affect the highest lying (3 1 A 1 , 4 1 A 1 , and 5 1 E or 3 3 A 1 and 5 3 E in the case of triplet states) states here studied and as they have not been included in the calculations, due to the prohibitively high computational effort involved, a lower accuracy is expected for these highest lying states, as compared to the lower lying ones. However, to the best of our knowledge there are no other highly correlated theoretical results concerning excited states of CH 3 Cl above $9.5 eV.…”
Section: ) Moleculementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many cases the energies of Rydberg states can be estimated through the Rydberg formula: [15][16][17] DE ¼ IE À Z/2(n À d l ) 2 (1) quantum number l. As can be seen from this equation the energies of Rydberg states for each series (e.g. s, p, d,.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This omission may impact the evaluation of computational methods and properties by introducing a negative bias against halogen compounds. We particularly felt that in recent simulations of halo-compounds of atmospheric interest [30][31][32][33][34] , where we could not count on performance evaluation for any of the molecules of interest. Our aim in this study is to start to fill this knowledge gap, first, by proposing a clear set of molecules to be tested; and second, by evaluating them using few popular methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%