2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12541-016-0135-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate calibration of systematic errors for car-like mobile robots using experimental orientation errors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some works, as [10], [17], [44], use information from additional encoders or encoders coupled in freewheels to decrease pose uncertainty. In [16], odometry uncertainty in car-like mobile robot is investigated.…”
Section: Other Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some works, as [10], [17], [44], use information from additional encoders or encoders coupled in freewheels to decrease pose uncertainty. In [16], odometry uncertainty in car-like mobile robot is investigated.…”
Section: Other Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several methods [11]- [16] based on experimental setups that can be used to estimate position uncertainty. These experimental evaluations of the uncertainties usually require many trials and, sometimes, another localization system to estimate the robot position.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jung [14] proposed a method that uses an oval track to accurately calibrate the odometry motion model based on the vehicle structure. For calibration, Jung suggests that the systematic errors comprise two representative variables: the wheelbase and the wheel diameter.…”
Section: Integration Of Odometry and Gnssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In ref. [ 42 ] the same robot and path are applied, but the experimental orientation error is utilized at the end of the path instead of the position error to eliminate the small-angle approximation. The four-wheel-steering of small RC cars is calibrated with a sequential method in ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%