1997
DOI: 10.1007/bf02317861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate characterization of machine compliance for simple compression testing

Abstract: ABSTRACT--Correction for machine compliance is an important step in analyzing the data obtained in many mechanical testing procedures. The difficulties associated with compliance correction, as they apply to the simple compression mode of testing, are explored in this paper. The commonly employed approach is to extend the procedure suggested in the ASTM standards for testing high modulus, single-filament materials, which implicitly assumes that the machine behaves as a linear spring with a constant compliance … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
47
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Compression tests were conducted using a Zwick/Roell universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.06 mm/min until failure. All experimental data has been corrected for machine compliance [35]. shows a deformed particle where evidence of cold welding and fracture can be clearly seen, in agreement with other published observations [32].…”
Section: Mechanical Testssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Compression tests were conducted using a Zwick/Roell universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.06 mm/min until failure. All experimental data has been corrected for machine compliance [35]. shows a deformed particle where evidence of cold welding and fracture can be clearly seen, in agreement with other published observations [32].…”
Section: Mechanical Testssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The compliance in the experimental set-up was 2 + 0.2 Â 10 25 mm N 21 , which is of similar order as reported in [53]. Additionally, the predictions of compressive strength from simulations, as described later in §4, were found to be largely insensitive to the minor variations observed in machine compliance.…”
Section: Micro-computed Tomography Scans and Compression Testingsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The compliance of the testing machine for compression, based on a technique proposed in [26], was performed to calculate the actual displacement of the specimen. In the 'direct technique' demonstrated by Kalidindi et al [26], the load-displacement relationship for the machine was measured without any specimen between the compression bars. The actual deformation of the sample can then be calculated by subtracting the non-sample displacement of the testing fixture from the total displacement recorded by the actuator.…”
Section: Compression Testmentioning
confidence: 99%