2012
DOI: 10.1021/jp2112632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate Computation of Gas Uptake in Microporous Organic Molecular Crystals

Abstract: Microporous organic molecular crystals (MOMCs) are materials composed of discrete organic molecules interacting noncovalently. The gas uptake of CO 2 , CH 4 , N 2 , and Xe in one of the most widely investigated MOMCs, trispiro(benzodioxole[2′.2:2″.4:2‴.6]1,3,5,2,4,6-triazatriphosphinine) (1), was computed by grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulations based on our lately developed force field method vdW3, which is fitted to accurate ab initio potentials (double hybrid functional B2PLYP with a D3 dispersion … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
60
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
3
60
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These simulations produce isotherms that can be compared to experimental results, but can also highlight favourable adsorption sites. 12,[83][84][85] However, as previously mentioned, PMMs exhibit significant structural flexibility and as a result the accuracy of conventional Monte Carlo simulations may be compromised. 86 GCMC typically treats the porous material as a rigid structure, accordingly, any dynamic porosity or structural responses (such as swelling) in response to guest molecules is ignored.…”
Section: Gas Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These simulations produce isotherms that can be compared to experimental results, but can also highlight favourable adsorption sites. 12,[83][84][85] However, as previously mentioned, PMMs exhibit significant structural flexibility and as a result the accuracy of conventional Monte Carlo simulations may be compromised. 86 GCMC typically treats the porous material as a rigid structure, accordingly, any dynamic porosity or structural responses (such as swelling) in response to guest molecules is ignored.…”
Section: Gas Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9, however, there was significant overestimation at elevated temperatures and for N 2 , CH 4 and Xe gases. 84 There are a number of computational routes to simulate gas sorption for soft materials that undergo phase transitions, 87 though we note these approaches have only been applied to a limited number of materials. 88,89 In spite of the challenges outlined here, these simulations have still been useful in predicting and understanding gas adsorption Please do not adjust margins…”
Section: Gas Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other recent applications, the (necessarily limited and biased) following selection tries only to show the wide and rich range of systems being currently afforded, include the modelling of ionic liquids [175], gas adsorption in metalorganic frameworks [176,177], isomerism in monosaccharides [178], conformational analysis [179,180], nonlinear optical responses [181], magnetic couplings in organometallics [182], enzymatic catalysis [183,184], electron paramagnetic resonance hyperfine coupling tensors [185], inclusion complexes and nanoencapsulation [186], electronic circular dichroism [187], organometallic complexes of graphene [188], interfacial chemistry [189], photosynthetic water oxidation [190], hyperpolarizability of pushpull systems [191], lightharvesting complexes [192], adsorbate-zeolite interactions [193], or harmonic and anharmonic vibrational frequency calculations [194], among others. • Figure 1.…”
Section: Self-interaction Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,21 These simultaneous optimizations of different force field terms can take advantage of extensive training sets that can be easily generated using electronic structure calculations and may include data on the intermolecular interaction energies. [22][23][24][25][26] Moreover, in this approach the fitted interaction energy would implicitly include the polarization effects, even staying within the fixed point-charge force field framework. 9,27,28 However, such simultaneous force field fitting represents a technically challenging multiobjective optimization of the parameters of different physical nature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%