2020
DOI: 10.1109/tsg.2020.2975752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate Consensus-Based Distributed Averaging With Variable Time Delay in Support of Distributed Secondary Control Algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As stated in ref. [30], the observer of the scheme can accurately track the average dynamic states (i.e., x i = ∑ N i=1 z i /N) only when τ remains unchanged, otherwise it would lead to convergence error from the exact solution. In contrast to the unchanged τ, the asynchronous sampling case considered in this paper is notoriously complex because the probability distribution of timeslot for information exchange is time-varying during the sampling procedure, which poses challenge to the ratio consensus algorithm in accurate average.…”
Section: Ratio Consensus Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated in ref. [30], the observer of the scheme can accurately track the average dynamic states (i.e., x i = ∑ N i=1 z i /N) only when τ remains unchanged, otherwise it would lead to convergence error from the exact solution. In contrast to the unchanged τ, the asynchronous sampling case considered in this paper is notoriously complex because the probability distribution of timeslot for information exchange is time-varying during the sampling procedure, which poses challenge to the ratio consensus algorithm in accurate average.…”
Section: Ratio Consensus Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that the asynchronous distributed average consensus may end up with an inexact average. As proposed in [5], [6], [7], [8], this issue can be obviated by augmenting auxiliary algorithms that require extra computing, possibly delaying the time to obtain the average. Sometimes it is beneficial in terms of computational speed and easiness of implementation to proceed with distributed averaging asynchronously, which necessitates rigorous analysis on how far the asynchronous average is deviated from the exact average.…”
Section: Average Error Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although an asynchronous algorithm, a counterpart of the synchronous one, naturally takes into account the above issues and hence more practical, it has been reported in [1], [2], [3], [4] that asynchronous information exchanges may lead to inaccuracy in solutions. Therefore, robust communication protocols have been studied (see [5], [6], [7], [8] to list a few) to correct biased averages. These protocols serve as a compensator to induce an exact average while allowing asynchronous communications between connected nodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the increasing number of DGs, it is impractical to implement a fully connected communication network among all DGs to make the system states globally accessible for regulations. However, consensus-based algorithms can calculate the average of locally measured parameters in a distributed way using a sparse communication network [19] . The conventional consensus-based algorithm, called average consensus, is only applicable to a group of static inputs.…”
Section: Introduction1mentioning
confidence: 99%