2013
DOI: 10.1002/cnm.2562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate determination of patient‐specific boundary conditions in computational vascular hemodynamics using 3D cine phase‐contrast MRI

Abstract: In the patient-specific vascular CFD, determination of the inlet and outlet boundary conditions (BCs) is an important issue for a valid diagnosis. The 3D cine phase-contrast MRI (4D Flow) velocimetry is promising for this issue; yet, its measured velocities contain relatively large error and are not admissible as the BCs without any correction. This paper proposes a novel correction method for determining the BCs accurately using the 4D Flow velocimetry. First, we reveal that the error of the velocity measured… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, there have been several patient-specific CFD studies on cerebral arterial flows involving a cerebral aneurysm, [3][4][5][6] which have included proposed risk assessments of aneurysm rupture [7][8][9] by enforcing the inlet flow rate evaluated by the velocity field of the PC-MRI measurement. However, the reconstructed flow fields in the PC-MRI data are usually unacceptable because the relatively large measurement noise, 10 low spatial resolution with respect to the size of cerebral vasculature, and physically inconsistent fields. Thus, the estimated inlet flow rate based on the PC-MRI velocity is also unacceptable, and it results in an unrealistic CFD solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, there have been several patient-specific CFD studies on cerebral arterial flows involving a cerebral aneurysm, [3][4][5][6] which have included proposed risk assessments of aneurysm rupture [7][8][9] by enforcing the inlet flow rate evaluated by the velocity field of the PC-MRI measurement. However, the reconstructed flow fields in the PC-MRI data are usually unacceptable because the relatively large measurement noise, 10 low spatial resolution with respect to the size of cerebral vasculature, and physically inconsistent fields. Thus, the estimated inlet flow rate based on the PC-MRI velocity is also unacceptable, and it results in an unrealistic CFD solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of new techniques such as phase contrast MRI enable derivation of accurate time dependent boundary conditions 97 and may even suppress the need for multi-scale descriptions at the global system scale. However this argument does not apply when future surgical interventions on existing anatomy are to be analyzed.…”
Section: Cardiovascular Fluid Mechanicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the pulsatile VFR of the inlet and outlets obtained by MRFD mentioned above as the inlet and outlet patient-specific boundary conditions. 10 We calculated CFD using 20 steps per one cardiac cycle with convergent calculation. Calculation of CFD was about 3 hours using a 3.1-GHz based on their definitions shown in the appendix.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%