2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12583-021-1535-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate Determination of Zr Isotopic Ratio in Zircons by Femtosecond Laser Ablation MC-ICP-MS with “Wet” Plasma Technique

Abstract: This work evaluates the use of femtosecond laser ablation multiple collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (fs-LA-MC-ICP-MS) for Zr isotopic analysis in zircons. The mass fractionation caused by instrumental mass discrimination was corrected by a combination of internal correction using Sr as an internal standard (coming from a NIST SRM 987 standard solution) and external correction using a matrix-matched standard. Several important instrument parameters were investigated, such as the effect of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…and Plešovice yielded δ 94 Zr values of -0.03 ± 0.12‰ (2SD, n=174) and 0.14 ± 0.10‰ (2SD, n=152), respectively, consistent with the recommended δ 94 Zr values measured by LA-MC-ICPMS 15 and solution MC-ICPMS 18,20,22,23 . The second session used zircon PAKI (δ 94 Zr = 0.21 ± 0.08‰) 23 as the calibration standard and US, Penglai and Plešovice as monitor standards.…”
Section: Methods Zircon Zr Isotope Analysessupporting
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…and Plešovice yielded δ 94 Zr values of -0.03 ± 0.12‰ (2SD, n=174) and 0.14 ± 0.10‰ (2SD, n=152), respectively, consistent with the recommended δ 94 Zr values measured by LA-MC-ICPMS 15 and solution MC-ICPMS 18,20,22,23 . The second session used zircon PAKI (δ 94 Zr = 0.21 ± 0.08‰) 23 as the calibration standard and US, Penglai and Plešovice as monitor standards.…”
Section: Methods Zircon Zr Isotope Analysessupporting
confidence: 78%
“…and Plešovice yielded δ 94 Zr values of -0.03 ± 0.12‰ (2SD, n=174) and 0.14 ± 0.10‰ (2SD, n=152), respectively, consistent with the recommended δ 94 Zr values measured by LA-MC-ICPMS 15 and solution MC-ICPMS 18,20,22,23 . The second session used zircon PAKI (δ 94 Zr = 0.21 ± 0.08‰) 23 as the calibration standard and US, Penglai and Plešovice as monitor standards. During this session, zircon US, Penglai and Plešovice gave δ 94 Zr values of 0.51 ± 0.12‰ (2SD, n=22), -0.11 ± 0.13‰ (2SD, n=10) and 0.17 and BIR-2G) were used for external calibration, and CGSG-1 glass was used as monitor standard.…”
Section: Methods Zircon Zr Isotope Analysessupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…, Mg isotopes in silicate samples, 39 Fe isotopes in Fe sulfides and oxides, 40 and Zr–Si isotopes in zircons. 41,42 Compared to ns-LA, particle size distribution produced by fs-LA is usually centered on d < 200 nm ( d is the aerodynamic diameter) and independent of the particle morphology, and no large size (>1 μm) bodies typical of ns-LA ablation melt or hard agglomeration products are observed. 43 Therefore, fs-LA produces much more consistent ablation for various materials, which largely minimizes the substrate and fluence dependence and thus improves analytical accuracy and precision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%