2019
DOI: 10.1186/s13072-019-0296-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate ethnicity prediction from placental DNA methylation data

Abstract: Background The influence of genetics on variation in DNA methylation (DNAme) is well documented. Yet confounding from population stratification is often unaccounted for in DNAme association studies. Existing approaches to address confounding by population stratification using DNAme data may not generalize to populations or tissues outside those in which they were developed. To aid future placental DNAme studies in assessing population stratification, we developed an ethnicity classifier, PlaNET (P… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ageing [13], obesity [14] and lipid levels [15]), as well as modifiers of APOE genotype effects (e.g. sex [16] and ethnicity [17,18]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ageing [13], obesity [14] and lipid levels [15]), as well as modifiers of APOE genotype effects (e.g. sex [16] and ethnicity [17,18]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The datasets compiled in this step include GSE73375 (n=9, North Carolina, USA) (23), GSE75428 (n=289, Rhode Island Child Health Study, Rhode Island, USA) (24), GSE98224 (n=9, Toronto, Canada) (25), GSE74738, GSE100197, GSE108567, and GSE128827 (n=34, all Epigenetics in Pregnancy Complications Cohort, Vancouver, Canada) (2629). These data were utilized as described in Yuan et al 2019, to generate PlaNET, the Placental DNAme Elastic Net Ethnicity Tool, which estimates metrics of genetic ancestry from placental DNAme datasets (28).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All samples from the discovery cohort (n=585) were subjected to routine filtering and normalization as described in Yuan et al 2019 (28). Briefly, CpGs removed included those targeted by non-specific probes (31, 32), known placental-specific non-variable CpGs (range of β values < 0.05 between the 10 th -90 th centile in all samples in this cohort) (33), and those with poor quality data (detection P value > 0.01 or bead count < 3 in more than 1% of samples) (34).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A total of 14 GEO datasets comprising 783 samples were included in the analysis, including 637 full term, 33 1st trimester, 72 2nd trimester, and 41 3rd trimester samples (Supplementary Table 1). We predicted the gestational age of these samples using the predictAge() function from the planet R package 53 to verify that our sample groups captured their intended points during the gestation period 54 .…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%