2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.08.19.257501
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate identification and quantification of commensal microbiota bound by host immunoglobulins

Abstract: Background: Identifying which taxa are targeted by immunoglobulins can uncover important host-microbe interactions. Immunoglobulin binding of commensal taxa can be assayed by sorting bound bacteria from samples and using amplicon sequencing to determine their taxonomy, a technique most widely applied to study Immunoglobulin A (IgA-Seq). Previous experiments have scored taxon binding in IgA-Seq datasets by comparing abundances in the IgA bound and unbound sorted fractions. However, as these are relative abundan… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Input, IgA- and IgA+ positive fractions were acquired and sequenced as previously described (83). To analyze these data we used either the IgA index (77) or a Bayesian method to predict the probability of a bacteria being found in either the IgA+ or IgA- fractions (84).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Input, IgA- and IgA+ positive fractions were acquired and sequenced as previously described (83). To analyze these data we used either the IgA index (77) or a Bayesian method to predict the probability of a bacteria being found in either the IgA+ or IgA- fractions (84).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The alpha diversity of the sIgA-positive and sIgA-negative fractions was significantly reduced compared to the non-sorted samples ( Figure 3A ). IgA probability ratios (‘IgA scores’ from here on) were calculated for all genus-level and species-level taxa (13) ( Supplementary file ). These scores are a measure for sIgA targeting of specific taxa within an individual, and range from −1 (all bacteria of a given taxon are in the sIgA-negative fraction) to +1 (all bacteria of a given taxon are in the sIgA-positive fraction).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, using a sequence depth of 1100 reads (for analysis of the non-sorted samples only) or 800 reads (for all other analyses), matrices were computed using the Phyloseq (v1.38) (43) and Microbial (v0.0.20) (44) packages in R. Beta diversity metrics were demonstrated using weighted Unifrac distance and Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) in QIIME2. IgA probability ratios were calculated using the IgAScores package in R (13). CST classification was performed using a custom Python script (deposited on GitHub: https://github.com/AhmedElsherbini/CST_picker), according to the original CST definitions (4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar increase in mucosal IgA was identified using flow cytometry in intraepithelial lymphocytes and when examining ELISA of gut homogenate tissue. IgA has been shown to play an integral role in maintaining homeostasis in the gut microbiota, with low affinity IgA contributing to microbiota maintenance and high-affinity IgA acting on pathogens to promote clearance and inhibit virulence (56,57). There is an important relationship between JAM-A and IgA in terms of susceptibility to colitis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%