2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate Image-guided (Re)Placement of NIRS Probes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could lead to variability in cap placement across participants, thus affecting the sensitivity of the probes to underlying brain areas Abdalmalak et al (2020) . A more sophisticated approach using a real-time neuronavigation system could decrease the variability in cap placement and increase the average correlation within each brain network, further strengthening our results ( Novi et al, 2020a ; Wu et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This could lead to variability in cap placement across participants, thus affecting the sensitivity of the probes to underlying brain areas Abdalmalak et al (2020) . A more sophisticated approach using a real-time neuronavigation system could decrease the variability in cap placement and increase the average correlation within each brain network, further strengthening our results ( Novi et al, 2020a ; Wu et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Although the high fNIRS variability is often attributed to low SNR, motion artifacts, and physiological noise, 127 132 recent works have shown that the lack of spatial information plays an important role in the observed fNIRS variability, particularly in low-density probes. 132 , 133 Variability in probe placement across subjects or sessions increases the fNIRS variance and reduces statistical power in data analysis. In some cases, marginal changes that are deemed statistically significant may merely reflect heterogeneity from underlying anatomy rather than brain functional changes.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 138 Another powerful alternative approach employs real-time neuronavigation software to guide the optode positioning. 132 , 133 , 139 With real-time feedback, one can precisely position the optodes on the subject’s head and guarantee the NIRS optodes are on the target ROI before any measurement is taken, thus reducing variability due to spatial imprecisions. When applied to a longitudinal study, this approach doubled the intra-subject reproducibility and increased the fNIRS sensitivity to detect hemodynamic changes during a motor task ( Fig.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most accurate optode array design results from individual anatomical information in combination with individual 3-dimensional optode coordinates that are obtained by digitization or neuronavigation tools [78][79][80] . The precision of this procedure can be further improved by incorporating functional MRI data of the same participant or based on a probabilistic approach 78 .…”
Section: Optode Array Design and Optode Placementmentioning
confidence: 99%