1986
DOI: 10.1016/0090-8258(86)90081-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate laboratory predictions of the clinical response of patients with advanced ovarian cancer to treatment with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent histologic observations in our laboratory 11 have indicated that the adaptation period could be as short as 2 weeks, reducing the entire process to 6 weeks. This relatively short period of 6 to 8 weeks makes the first generation xenografts, as distinct from transplantable tumor lines (13,15,24,36), suitable for clinical application.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent histologic observations in our laboratory 11 have indicated that the adaptation period could be as short as 2 weeks, reducing the entire process to 6 weeks. This relatively short period of 6 to 8 weeks makes the first generation xenografts, as distinct from transplantable tumor lines (13,15,24,36), suitable for clinical application.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an alternative approach, chemosensitivity of patients' cancers to various regimens can be evaluated using transplantable subcutaneous tumor lines developed from resected cancer specimens. Although such tumor lines are valuable for drug development and may lead to useful predictions (9)(10)(11)(12), the engraftment rate of s.c. implanted cancers is low (20-40%) and establishing transplantable tumor lines may take as long as 10 months (13)(14)(15)(16)(17), severely limiting the usefulness of this approach for personalized chemotherapy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical response was taken as a complete or more than 50% regression verified at second look in our report and of at least 4 months' duration in the other three reports. The sensitivity and negative prospective value are extremely good, In addition, our laboratory has recently shown very good correlates for ovarian cancer (14). We have shown a 100% positive predictive accuracy for ovarian cancer patients whose tumors are sensitive to Cisplatin, Adriamycin, and Cytoxan; i.e., if the patient was sensitive to the administered drug(s), the SRC assay always predicted sensitivity.…”
Section: Results and Commentsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The subrenal capsule assay (SRCA) (Bogden et al, 1981) correctly predicts the response to cytostatic chemotherapy in 63-85% of patients with previously untreated ovarian cancer (Bogden, 1985;Griffin et al, 1983;Maenpaa et al, 1985a,b;Stratton et al, 1984Stratton et al, , 1986Stratton et al, , 1988. The situation may differ in cases with recurrent cancer, when cell populations resistant to first-line chemotherapy have become selected out to form clinically detectable tumours (Maenpaa, 1985c).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four of the 11 patients (36%) whose further chemotherapy was strictly chosen based on the SRCA and seven of the 24 patients (29%) whose treatment was based on physician's choice survived at least 3 years. Our conclusion is that the SRCA is of limited value in the selection of second-line chemotherapy in recurrent ovarian cancer.The subrenal capsule assay (SRCA) (Bogden et al, 1981) correctly predicts the response to cytostatic chemotherapy in 63-85% of patients with previously untreated ovarian cancer (Bogden, 1985; Griffin et al, 1983; Maenpaa et al, 1985a,b;Stratton et al, 1984Stratton et al, , 1986 Stratton et al, , 1988 (Maenpaa, 1985c). There are some data to suggest that the SRCA could be useful in the selection of the second-line chemotherapy (Griffin et al, 1983;Maenpaa, 1985c), but so far no data exist on improved survival rates in patients whose second-line chemotherapy has been guided by the use of the SRCA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%