1981
DOI: 10.1364/ao.20.000736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate laser wavelength measurement with a precision two-beam scanning Michelson interferometer

Abstract: This paper gives the details of a precision two-beam scanning Michelson interferometer, designed and perfected for accurate comparison of an unknown laser wavelength and the precisely calibrated wavelength of a reference laser. An iodine Lamb-dip stabilized He-Ne 633-nm laser (calibrated with respect to a Kr standard) is used as the reference. The design incorporates features to minimize instrumental errors and the effect of fringe shifts caused by diffraction (in the IR). It is applied to accurate measurement… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The WA-1500 wavemeter uses a Michelson interferometer to generate sinusoidal interference fringes from the input radiation [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. The optical layout is shown schematically in Fig.…”
Section: Description Of the Wavemetermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The WA-1500 wavemeter uses a Michelson interferometer to generate sinusoidal interference fringes from the input radiation [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. The optical layout is shown schematically in Fig.…”
Section: Description Of the Wavemetermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This beam can be described by an intensity distribution with an angular distribution of wavevectors across its finite aperture. For this case the change of the wavenumber is discussed in the literature [13,14] with the estimation for the centre of the beam…”
Section: Theoretical Description Of the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A mathematical model for the wavelength uncertainty of the wavemeter was proposed taking into account all contributions [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]: Wavelength correction due to wavefront curvature of the unknown laser λ WCR Wavelength correction due to wavefront curvature of the reference laser λ ALIGU Wavelength correction due to unknown laser beam misalignment λ ALIGR Wavelength correction due to reference laser beam misalignment λ TEMP Wavelength correction due to thermal expansion λ CIDOR Wavelength correction due to air refractive index, (made with Cidor equation) λ VIB Wavelength correction due to optical system vibration In equation (2) the first term can be simplified to λ U = λ R (N R /N U ) due to the difference between the refractive index of air of both laser beams is less than 0.01ppm, in our laboratory environmental conditions through Cidor equation [18]. This occur because of the similarity between the wavelength of reference and unknown lasers (<0,005 nm).…”
Section: Uncertainty Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%