Accurate modeling and performance evaluation of a total‐body pet scanner using Monte Carlo simulations

Abstract

BackgroundThe limited axial field‐of‐view (FOV) of conventional clinical positron emission tomography (PET) scanners (∼15 to 26 cm) allows detecting only 1% of all coincidence photons, hence limiting significantly their sensitivity. To overcome this limitation, the EXPLORER consortium developed the world's first total‐body PET/CT scanner that significantly increased the sensitivity, thus enabling to decrease the scan duration or injected dose.PurposeThe purpose of this study is to perform and validate Monte Carlo simulations of the uEXPLORER PET scanner, which can be used to devise novel conceptual designs and geometrical configurations through obtaining features that are difficult to obtain experimentally.MethodsThe total‐body uEXPLORER PET scanner was modeled using GATE Monte Carlo (MC) platform. The model was validated through comparison with experimental measurements of various performance parameters, including spatial resolution, sensitivity, count rate performance, and image quality, according to NEMA‐NU2 2018 standards. Furthermore, the effects of the time coincidence window and maximum ring difference on the count rate and noise equivalent count rate (NECR) were evaluated.ResultsOverall, the validation study showed that there was a good agreement between the simulation and experimental results. The differences between the simulated and experimental total sensitivity for the NEMA and extended phantoms at the center of the FOV were 2.3% and 0.0%, respectively. The difference in peak NECR was 9.9% for the NEMA phantom and 1.0% for the extended phantom. The average bias between the simulated and experimental results of the full‐width‐at‐half maximum (FWHM) for six different positions and three directions was 0.12 mm. The simulations showed that using a variable coincidence time window based on the maximum ring difference can reduce the effect of random coincidences and improve the NECR compared to a constant time coincidence window. The NECR corresponding to 252‐ring difference was 2.11 Mcps, which is larger than the NECR corresponding to 336‐ring difference (2.04 Mcps).ConclusionThe developed MC model of the uEXPLORER PET scanner was validated against experimental measurements and can be used for further assessment and design optimization of the scanner.