2006
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/8/11/285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate modelling of charged particle beams in linear accelerators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To see how good this approximation is, we have performed numerical, time-domain calculations using the program CST PS, both for an example with the beam on axis between two dechirper plates, and for an example with the beam passing by a single plate. For the case of two dechirper plates, the accuracy of CST PS simulations was verified by cross-checking with results using the wakefield code PBCI [14]. Since the bunches are short (z rms ∼ 20 μm), the catch-up distance [z cu ∼ a 2 =ð2σ z Þ] is large (on the order of cm's).…”
Section: Numerical Time-domain Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To see how good this approximation is, we have performed numerical, time-domain calculations using the program CST PS, both for an example with the beam on axis between two dechirper plates, and for an example with the beam passing by a single plate. For the case of two dechirper plates, the accuracy of CST PS simulations was verified by cross-checking with results using the wakefield code PBCI [14]. Since the bunches are short (z rms ∼ 20 μm), the catch-up distance [z cu ∼ a 2 =ð2σ z Þ] is large (on the order of cm's).…”
Section: Numerical Time-domain Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We thus expect our results to underestimate the Joule power losses. Finally, we test the accuracy of these calculations, by performing numerical simulations using the timedomain Maxwell equation solver in CST PARTICLE STUDIO (PS) [13], and also (for verification purposes) with the program PBCI [14]. These calculations are themselves quite challenging, since a fine mesh is needed to resolve the short bunch, and runs need to be performed over a large mesh domain for a relatively long time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discretizations of Maxwell's equations using the Discontinuous Galerkin Method have been obtained among others in [7,8,9,10]. We will follow the framework and notation described in our previous work [26], which makes use of hexahedral meshes and modal basis functions as introduced in [10].…”
Section: Discretization Of Maxwell's Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5,6,7] and references therein). Concerning Maxwell's equations in time-domain, the DGM has been studied in particular in [7,8,9,10]. The latter two make use of hexahedral meshes, which allow for a computationally more efficient implementation [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method introduces equivalent charge r ( ) ρ and current J r ( ) densities, and projects them into the computational grid. It is further used to model RF accelerators and guns [37]. Nonetheless, there are several restrictions to the algorithm which makes it not suitable for problems involving ultrafast field variations and tiny charge distributions [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%