2018
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate nonlinear mapping between MNI volumetric and FreeSurfer surface coordinate systems

Abstract: The results of most neuroimaging studies are reported in volumetric (e.g., MNI152) or surface (e.g., fsaverage) coordinate systems. Accurate mappings between volumetric and surface coordinate systems can facilitate many applications, such as projecting fMRI group analyses from MNI152/Colin27 to fsaverage for visualization or projecting resting-state fMRI parcellations from fsaverage to MNI152/Colin27 for volumetric analysis of new data. However, there has been surprisingly little research on this topic. Here, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
98
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
98
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To obtain the MNI coordinates of each insular electrode contact, we normalized individual MRI scans to a standard T1 template in MNI space using BrainVoyager 20.2 (Brain Innovation, Maastricht, The Netherlands). To visualize the spatial distributions of the response amplitudes at each contact location in the left and right insula, we then used the MNI coordinates to generate group-level 3D glass brain plots using the iELVis open source Matlab toolbox 35 and a FreeSurfer anatomical atlas ( http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/ ), after performing nonlinear mapping between the MNI volumetric coordinate system and the FreeSurfer surface coordinate system 36 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain the MNI coordinates of each insular electrode contact, we normalized individual MRI scans to a standard T1 template in MNI space using BrainVoyager 20.2 (Brain Innovation, Maastricht, The Netherlands). To visualize the spatial distributions of the response amplitudes at each contact location in the left and right insula, we then used the MNI coordinates to generate group-level 3D glass brain plots using the iELVis open source Matlab toolbox 35 and a FreeSurfer anatomical atlas ( http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/ ), after performing nonlinear mapping between the MNI volumetric coordinate system and the FreeSurfer surface coordinate system 36 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note, for visualisation of volume normalised data, we utilised an optimal MNI 152 to fsaverage mapping strategy (Wu et al, ). Data from both normalisation streams were additionally displayed on a flattened representation of fsaverage, calculated by making cuts to the cortical surface and using a cost function to metrically optimise (in terms of distance) the flattened representation (available as standard in Freesurfer).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cortical reconstruction, volumetric segmentation and cortical thickness extraction used recon-all , and the output was inspected for quality assurance. The individual cortical thickness (CT) maps were then transformed into MNI space using the non-linear mapping method proposed by Wu et al (2018) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%