Accurate Prediction of Cation−π Interaction Energy Using Substituent Effects

Abstract

Substituent effects on cation-π interactions have been quantified using a variety of Φ-X···M(+) complexes where Φ, X, and M(+) are the π-system, substituent, and cation, respectively. The cation-π interaction energy, E(M(+)), showed a strong linear correlation with the molecular electrostatic potential (MESP) based measure of the substituent effect, ΔV(min) (the difference between the MESP minimum (V(min)) on the π-region of a substituted system and the corresponding unsubstituted system). This linear relationship is E(M(+)) = C(M(+))(ΔV(min)) + E(M(+))' where C(M(+)) is the reaction constant and E(M(+))' is the cation-π interaction energy of the unsubstituted complex. This relationship is similar to the Hammett equation and its first term yields the substituent contribution of the cation-π interaction energy. Further, a linear correlation between C(M(+))() and E(M(+))()' has been established, which facilitates the prediction of C(M(+)) for unknown cations. Thus, a prediction of E(M(+)) for any Φ-X···M(+) complex is achieved by knowing the values of E(M(+))' and ΔV(min). The generality of the equation is tested for a variety of cations (Li(+), Na(+), K(+), Mg(+), BeCl(+), MgCl(+), CaCl(+), TiCl(3)(+), CrCl(2)(+), NiCl(+), Cu(+), ZnCl(+), NH(4)(+), CH(3)NH(3)(+), N(CH(3))(4)(+), C(NH(2))(3)(+)), substituents (N(CH(3))(2), NH(2), OCH(3), CH(3), OH, H, SCH(3), SH, CCH, F, Cl, COOH, CHO, CF(3), CN, NO(2)), and a large number of π-systems. The tested systems also include multiple substituted π-systems, viz. ethylene, acetylene, hexa-1,3,5-triene, benzene, naphthalene, indole, pyrrole, phenylalanine, tryptophan, tyrosine, azulene, pyrene, [6]-cyclacene, and corannulene and found that E(M)(+) follows the additivity of substituent effects. Further, the substituent effects on cationic sandwich complexes of the type C(6)H(6)···M(+)···C(6)H(5)X have been assessed and found that E(M(+)) can be predicted with 97.7% accuracy using the values of E(M(+))' and ΔV(min). All the Φ-X···M(+) systems showed good agreement between the calculated and predicted E(M(+))() values, suggesting that the ΔV(min) approach to substituent effect is accurate and useful for predicting the interactive behavior of substituted π-systems with cations.

The multiple roles of histidine in protein interactions

“…The cation-π and π-π stacking interactions have been studied by many authors using several QM methods [35,36]. The DFT method B3LYP is a widely used method in organic chemistry and biochemistry because of its higher accuracy and less computational workload [37,38].…”

Interaction between ions and substituted buckybowls: A comprehensive computational study

“…[87][88][89][90][91] If all contributions are the same as in the unsubstituted complexes except electrostatics, the interaction can be predicted checking only changes in electrostatics. A priori, sumanene should interact repulsively by electrostatics with chloride, but penetration makes this contribution attractive and of similar size as that observed in sodium complexes.…”

“…This is the basis of some approximate methods estimating the strength of ionÁÁÁp interactions. [87][88][89][90][91] If all contributions are the same as in the unsubstituted complexes except electrostatics, the interaction can be predicted checking only changes in electrostatics. These approximate methods face several problems,…”

Hyperconjugative effects in π‐hydrogen bonding: Theory and experiment

“…The V Y values also proved good reactivity indices for a number of chemical reactions . In later studies, other authors have also successfully applied EPN values in describing chemical reactivity . Alternative definitions reflecting local properties of the molecular electrostatic potential (MESP), especially the MESP minimum ( V min ), have found successful application in defining chemical reactivity …”