2009
DOI: 10.1128/aem.00796-09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate Quantification of Microorganisms in PCR-Inhibiting Environmental DNA Extracts by a Novel Internal Amplification Control Approach Using Biotrove OpenArrays

Abstract: PCR-based detection assays are prone to inhibition by substances present in environmental samples, thereby potentially leading to inaccurate target quantification or false-negative results. Internal amplification controls (IACs) have been developed to help alleviate this problem but are generally applied in a single concentration, thereby yielding less-than-optimal results across the wide range of microbial gene target concentrations possible in environmental samples (J. Hoorfar, B. Malorny, A. Abdulmawjood, N… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, when RT and qPCR was performed with 10-fold-diluted RNA samples, sample recovery efficiencies were improved from 9.4% to 27.0%, whereas NoV GI and GII and RoV dropped below the quantification limit (data not shown). Regardless, the sample process control and IAC are useful for evaluating the performance for virus concentration, RNA extraction and purification, RT, STA, and qPCR (18,29,47). We can determine if any of these processes need to be redone based on low sample recovery efficiencies or IAC recovery efficiencies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, when RT and qPCR was performed with 10-fold-diluted RNA samples, sample recovery efficiencies were improved from 9.4% to 27.0%, whereas NoV GI and GII and RoV dropped below the quantification limit (data not shown). Regardless, the sample process control and IAC are useful for evaluating the performance for virus concentration, RNA extraction and purification, RT, STA, and qPCR (18,29,47). We can determine if any of these processes need to be redone based on low sample recovery efficiencies or IAC recovery efficiencies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Process controls are used to evaluate and normalize the DNA recovery efficiency when processing samples for qPCR (7,48), while internal amplification controls are used to evaluate the DNA quality (e.g., the presence of PCR inhibitors) in each DNA sample (47,49). In this study, we used Pseudogulbenkiania sp.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar DNA recovery efficiencies were obtained from EHEC strain Sakai and strain NH8B, suggesting that strain NH8B could be used as a process control during the quantification of EHEC. Although it was not examined in this study, the NH8B_3641 standard plasmid could also be used as a noncompetitive internal amplification control (49) if added to the sample DNA.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Secondly, the GeoChip also follows the microarray design concept with 167,044 50-mer oligos covering 395,894 coding sequences from bacteria, achaea, fungi and viruses (He et al,0000). Thirdly, the Biotrove Open Array system has been used extensively for environmental samples (van Doorn et al, 2009). It allows high throughput qPCR reactions in 33 nL volumes.…”
Section: Traditional Methods For Analysis Of Microalgaementioning
confidence: 99%