2007
DOI: 10.1118/1.2769102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate quantification of width and density of bone structures by computed tomography

Abstract: In computed tomography (CT), the representation of edges between objects of different densities is influenced by the limited spatial resolution of the scanner. This results in the misrepresentation of density of narrow objects, leading to errors of up to 70% and more. Our interest is in the imaging and measurement of narrow bone structures, and the issues are the same for imaging with clinical CT scanners, peripheral quantitative CT scanners or micro CT scanners. Mathematical models, phantoms and tests with pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An algorithm was developed to identify the density maxima of both the inner and outer cortical layers and the intervening lower density values of the diploë. The outer boundaries of the cortical layers were defined as the points where the density values were equal to or greater than half of the associated cortical maximum, consistent with published recommendations [16][17][18]. The inner cortical boundaries were defined as the points where the density values were half of the difference between the cortical maximum and diploë minimum.…”
Section: Measurements Of Skull Layersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An algorithm was developed to identify the density maxima of both the inner and outer cortical layers and the intervening lower density values of the diploë. The outer boundaries of the cortical layers were defined as the points where the density values were equal to or greater than half of the associated cortical maximum, consistent with published recommendations [16][17][18]. The inner cortical boundaries were defined as the points where the density values were half of the difference between the cortical maximum and diploë minimum.…”
Section: Measurements Of Skull Layersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the energy of the incident beam is 60 keV and the FS and BS scattering angles are 15 and 165 , the energy difference between the forward and backward scattered components is about 11 keV. Different penetration abilities and possible differences in the thicknesses of the surrounding tissues can result in varying amounts of attenuation among the FS and BS beams.…”
Section: Iia Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. Incident, forward scattered at 15 , and backscattered at 165 spectra recorded from a test object containing a mineral concentration of 166.7 mg=cm 3 using a maximum voltage of 76.5 kV are shown. The endpoint energy of the incident beam appears to be slightly higher due to the summing effect as a consequence of high count rates.…”
Section: Iiia (Fs-bs) Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…34 A few algorithms have been dedicated for cortical bone segmentation at femur using 3-D QCT imaging. 33,[35][36][37][38] Recent advancements in multirow-detector CT (MD-CT) imaging technologies have enabled a resolution that allows in vivo segmentation of individual trabeculae and their microarchitectural analysis at peripheral anatomic sites, e.g., distal tibia. 39 A major advantage of bone CT imaging at a peripheral site as compared to a central site, e.g., proximal femur is that a peripheral bone CT requires significantly lower radiation dose as compared to a femur CT-a few days of background radiation for a peripheral bone CT versus two or three years of background radiation for a bone CT at a central site.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%