2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate Recycling of Parental Histones Reproduces the Histone Modification Landscape during DNA Replication

Abstract: SummaryChromatin organization is disrupted genome-wide during DNA replication. On newly synthesized DNA, nucleosomes are assembled from new naive histones and old modified histones. It remains unknown whether the landscape of histone post-translational modifications (PTMs) is faithfully copied during DNA replication or the epigenome is perturbed. Here we develop chromatin occupancy after replication (ChOR-seq) to determine histone PTM occupancy immediately after DNA replication and across the cell cycle. We sh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

19
217
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(236 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
19
217
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter analysis not only replicated published data on CTCF-mediated looping changes across the cell cycles, but also revealed novel cell cycle dynamics of polycomb-associated interactions with highest contact enrichment around the time of mitosis. We note that these observations are generally consistent with the dilution and slow recovery of the H3K27me3 mark after the replication fork (Alabert et al, 2015;Reverón-Gómez et al, 2018), as well as an antagonistic relationship between cohesinmediated loop extrusion and looping between RING1B target sites, reported previously (Rhodes et al, 2019). These observations also pose a question of whether polycomb-associated interactions persist in metaphase chromosomes -a possibility since components of CBX2-containing PRC1 remain associated with metaphase chromosomes (Zhen et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The latter analysis not only replicated published data on CTCF-mediated looping changes across the cell cycles, but also revealed novel cell cycle dynamics of polycomb-associated interactions with highest contact enrichment around the time of mitosis. We note that these observations are generally consistent with the dilution and slow recovery of the H3K27me3 mark after the replication fork (Alabert et al, 2015;Reverón-Gómez et al, 2018), as well as an antagonistic relationship between cohesinmediated loop extrusion and looping between RING1B target sites, reported previously (Rhodes et al, 2019). These observations also pose a question of whether polycomb-associated interactions persist in metaphase chromosomes -a possibility since components of CBX2-containing PRC1 remain associated with metaphase chromosomes (Zhen et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…They are at their weakest during S phase, progressively strengthening during G2 and not reaching their peak until early G1. This is consistent with the cell cycle kinetics of H3K27me3 abundance at polycomb marked sites with H3K27me3 levels lowest during S phase where they are diluted after the replication fork, and levels of H3K27me3 only accumulating slowly through G2 and not peaking again until G1 of the next cell cycle (Reverón-Gómez et al, 2018).…”
Section: Applications Of Pile-upssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…It is only through our technique that accurately scores for parental nucleosome position prior to DNA replication that the parental histone origin can be determined. Although ChIP-seq and imaging systems in conjunction with synchronization experiments can detect the restoration dynamics of newly synthesized chromatin (Clement et al, 2018;Reveron-Gomez et al, 2018), such genomewide approaches cannot ascertain the original locale of a parental nucleosome. Thus, our findings here can attribute the inheritance of a repressed state to both the local segregation of parental nucleosomes and to the "write and read" modules of the histone methyltransferase that deposit the repressive modification ( Figure 6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the in vivo re-deposition of parental histones within the general vicinity of their original genomic position has not yet been examined through direct methods, but instead through proteomics, marking of newly replicated DNA and ChIP-sequencing techniques (Zee et al, 2012;Alabert et al, 2014;Clement et al, 2018;Reveron-Gomez et al, 2018). Although, the combination of these approaches provides insights into the "bulk" re-deposition of parental nucleosomes, these studies cannot determine the fidelity of such re-deposition at a given chromatin domain, key to tackling the mechanisms of epigenetic inheritance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…heritable information, similarly to the silenced state. Histone modifications associated with active transcription can be transmitted through DNA replication(Alabert et al 2015;Reverón-Gómez et al 2018) and multiple transcription factors can bind to the histone modifications they generate(Jacobson et al 2000;Owen et al 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%