2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.10.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate registration of cone-beam computed tomography scans to 3-dimensional facial photographs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
17
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…1). Two images were automatically registered by voxelization, skin segmentation, and the Chamfer distance transformation using the Morpheus 3D software [11].
Fig.
…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). Two images were automatically registered by voxelization, skin segmentation, and the Chamfer distance transformation using the Morpheus 3D software [11].
Fig.
…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nahm et al [ 21 ] also similarly found the registration relationship between CBCT and facial surfaces to be very close and concluded that merging CBCT and facial scans can produce a much truthful image of the patient to give the orthodontist enhanced diagnostic information and lessen errors in diagnosis. These findings agree with the present study, since it was found that other than some of the few distances mentioned above, many other ratios have excellent soft tissue to CBCT ratio percentages, such as the width between outer eye corners (−0.74%), left (−2.94%) and right (−3.99%) corners of the mouth to EAM, and the nasion to gnathion (−4.38%) measurement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, 3-dimensional facial surface scans have been co-registered with cone-beam computed tomography data, 43 and the method could be used to identify bone position in relation to tissue damage. Facial bone distances have been determined from correlations of magnetic resonance imaging data and frontal color photographs, suggesting that photographs could be used to judge bone location.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%