2011
DOI: 10.1063/1.3625373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate Resolution Measurement for X‐Ray Micro‐CT Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, ~ 300 μ m wide strips were diced off to create structures that fit within FOV of a high resolution micro-CT (Sen Sharma et al 2013). These structures are marked by white arrows in Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Next, ~ 300 μ m wide strips were diced off to create structures that fit within FOV of a high resolution micro-CT (Sen Sharma et al 2013). These structures are marked by white arrows in Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In high-resolution micro-CT, the most commonly used phantoms are thin test patterns fabricated by semiconductor fabrication techniques, but they allow system characterization in the projection domain only (Sen Sharma et al 2011). 3D micro-CT phantoms allowing quantification in reconstructed slices (Mizutani et al 2010) have been difficult to fabricate, or are not yet readily available (Sen Sharma et al 2013). Most importantly, previously reported micro-CT phantoms were not suitable for characterizing interior reconstruction, and thus, new phantoms were fabricated for this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since W sx and W sy are approximately the same, we can conclude that the source PSF is approximately circular in shape. Using the method in [21], the manufacturer of the X-ray system estimated the source PSF to have a FWHM of 3.63µm using calibration data at a SOD of 10mm and ODD of 30mm. For this case, the ratio ODD/SOD lies in between the data acquisition parameters of the second and third rows in Table I.…”
Section: A Blur Psf Parameter Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data-driven approaches to blur estimation relies on calculation of the PSF from radiographs of an object with known composition and shape such as a rollbar, slit, pinhole, or other test objects [17]- [21]. However, these methods only estimate one PSF that either models the X-ray source blur, the detector blur, or the total effective blur.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The regularization function in (21) enforces smoothness in T k (i, j) by penalizing the difference in values between neighboring pixels with a 1.2-norm penalty function [39], [40]. The optimization problem in ( 21) is solved using the L-BFGS-B algorithm [35].…”
Section: B Regularized Least Squares Deconvolution (Rlsd)mentioning
confidence: 99%