2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10909-007-9616-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate Thermal Conductance and Impedance Measurements of Transition Edge Sensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We will also try taking our I-V data while amplitude modulating the bias current at several frequencies, following the method developed by Lindeman et al 8,9 This will allow continuous acquisition of A ( w ) admittance measurements at every operating point. The results should allow us to derive α and β directly (the separately determined G ( T ) is required for α ), without the necessity of taking differences to get the derivatives.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We will also try taking our I-V data while amplitude modulating the bias current at several frequencies, following the method developed by Lindeman et al 8,9 This will allow continuous acquisition of A ( w ) admittance measurements at every operating point. The results should allow us to derive α and β directly (the separately determined G ( T ) is required for α ), without the necessity of taking differences to get the derivatives.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first determined the thermal conductance from the TES to the substrate G ( T ) from a set of points with the same R , choosing an R near the top of the transition where it has almost no I -dependence. 8 Those points therefore have a constant T TES , and the dependence of TES power on T base can be used to determine G ( T ). This G ( T ) was used to calculate the TES temperature T for each point on the IV curves by integrating the dissipated power divided by G ( T ) from the known substrate temperature up to T TES , resulting in a densely measured T ( I, V ) surface as shown in Fig.…”
Section: R(t I Bext) Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TES size, decreases. This highly current-dependent transition shape makes the determination of G challenging [11], as we no longer expect our data to be consistent with (1) globally. To accurately interpret measurements, it is crucial to calculate G at many discrete points through the TES transition by iterating the procedure described earlier in this section for many TES resistances.…”
Section: Determining G Considering Weak Link Effectsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Moreover, the fact that the characteristic temperature of the initial resistance drop remains nearly constant, whereas the onset of dissipation shifts significantly towards lower temperatures with rising current, indicates that care must be taken when defining the critical temperature and the transition width, since the values obtained at low current (from the basic R(T) characterization of the TES transition) may not be suitable for higher currents (biased TES). Also, the validity of the thermal equation ( ) = ( − ), most often used to extract the TES thermal parameters from the I-V curves, is questionable, as already shown first by Lindeman et al [30] and later by Bailey et al [31] when analysing weak link effects. Indeed, the strong dependence of the resistive transition on the external electrical current observed here would have similar consequences to those arising from the weak link dependence.…”
Section: Impact Of the Observed R(ti) On Tesmentioning
confidence: 99%