2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate trace element analysis of speleothems and biogenic calcium carbonates by LA-ICP-MS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
180
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 225 publications
(194 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
12
180
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the extended uncertainty of analysis ) is a function of the analytical uncertainty on the values in the reference material in addition to crater aspect ratios and matrix, the advantages of using NIST SRM glasses outweigh the disadvantages of an unmatched matrix. The extended uncertainty on Mg is in fact twice as high (16%, Jochum et al (2012) their Table 1) for MACS3…”
Section: Specimen Analysismentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since the extended uncertainty of analysis ) is a function of the analytical uncertainty on the values in the reference material in addition to crater aspect ratios and matrix, the advantages of using NIST SRM glasses outweigh the disadvantages of an unmatched matrix. The extended uncertainty on Mg is in fact twice as high (16%, Jochum et al (2012) their Table 1) for MACS3…”
Section: Specimen Analysismentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, these element fractionation effects are largest for siderophile elements, while lithophile elements like Mg are less or not at all affected (Czas et al, 2012;Fryer et al, 1995;Hathorne et al, 2007;Jochum et al, 2012). Elemental fractionation is higher for smaller craters than for larger craters at constant sampling time.…”
Section: Specimen Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Strnad et al [145] and Chen et al [47] reported that the analysis results of carbonate samples calibrated against silicate reference glasses and those of carbonate samples calibrated against reference carbonate pellets exhibited no significant difference. However, Jochum et al [95] suggested that accurate results can be obtained through calibration against silicate reference glasses for large ion lithophile elements but that matrix-matched standard calibration may be required for chalcophile and siderophile elements.…”
Section: Silicate and Carbonate Mineralsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classification of elements based on the FI roughly follows the Goldschmidt geochemical classification of elements [86,97,102]. Košler et al [95] found that the formation of phases of different mineralogy and/or chemical composition from the original sample at the ablation site can result in elemental fractionation (non-stoichiometric sampling) in material delivered to an ICP-MS for quantitative analysis. For example, both larger spherical particles and agglomerates of smaller particles produced by the ablation of zircon (ZrSiO 4 ) are mixtures of amorphous and crystalline materials-most likely zircon, baddeleyite (ZrO 2 ) and SiO 2 .…”
Section: Elemental Fractionation In Ablation Transport and Excitatiomentioning
confidence: 99%