1969
DOI: 10.1002/qua.560030104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate variational calculation of upper and lower bounds of dispersion interaction constant of two hydrogen atoms

Abstract: The most accurate calculation of the dispersion interaction of two hydrogen atoms 'in the ground state was performed by Hirschfelder and Lowdin [l]. Using a modified variational procedure the numerical value 6.499026 (in atomic units) for the coefficient C, in the dispersion interaction formulaI n recent years several definite variational principles were proposed, which allow both the upper and lower bounds to be obtained for the second-order energy correction [2, 31 and for the static and dynamic polarizibili… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1970
1970
1981
1981

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work interest was focused on scattering from the complete n = 2 shell of a model atom (Coulomb field approximation), which implies a coherent summation over the contribution of the n = 2, l = 1 substates, rather than averaging over their incoherent contributions as needed for the case of a H atom. Scattering from the n=2 states was also considered by other authors, using somewhat different techniques (case 2s: Zernik [10], Klarsfeld [11,12], Granovski [13], Zon et al [-14], Adamov et al [15], Gontier and Trahin [16]; case 2p: Zonet al [14], see also Adamov et al [15]). The analytic results derived for the 2s case [9,[12][13][14] agree; however only limited computations have been performed (see [12]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this work interest was focused on scattering from the complete n = 2 shell of a model atom (Coulomb field approximation), which implies a coherent summation over the contribution of the n = 2, l = 1 substates, rather than averaging over their incoherent contributions as needed for the case of a H atom. Scattering from the n=2 states was also considered by other authors, using somewhat different techniques (case 2s: Zernik [10], Klarsfeld [11,12], Granovski [13], Zon et al [-14], Adamov et al [15], Gontier and Trahin [16]; case 2p: Zonet al [14], see also Adamov et al [15]). The analytic results derived for the 2s case [9,[12][13][14] agree; however only limited computations have been performed (see [12]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For the 2p case the existing formulas are either not directly applicable to 0340-2193/79/0293/0269/$02. 20 the case of hydrogen [9,15], or have been presented in an unwieldy form; no numerical evaluations have been published. In view of the experimental interest in this problem, we shall present in the following complete analytic results and a numerical evaluation for the cross sections of Rayleigh scattering from atomic H in the 2s and 2p states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting bounds for C, are given in Table I11 where comparison is made with the variational calculations of Adamov, Balmakov and Rebane [16]. In the latter work bounds for C, were calculated in a straightforward way, as bounds for the second-order correction to energy of the system consisting of two hydrogen atoms.…”
Section: Calculation Of Bounds Of the Imaginary-frequency Polarizabilmentioning
confidence: 99%