2006
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0601476103
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurately quantifying low-abundant targets amid similar sequences by revealing hidden correlations in oligonucleotide microarray data

Abstract: Microarrays have enabled the determination of how thousands of genes are expressed to coordinate function within single organisms. Yet applications to natural or engineered communities where different organisms interact to produce complex properties are hampered by theoretical and technological limitations. Here we describe a general method to accurately identify low-abundant targets in systems containing complex mixtures of homologous targets. We combined an analytical predictor of nonspecific probe–target in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with previous studies (Marcelino et al . ; Pozhitkov et al . ), the RumenBactArray can provide relatively accurate quantification of bacteria, even bacteria present at low abundance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with previous studies (Marcelino et al . ; Pozhitkov et al . ), the RumenBactArray can provide relatively accurate quantification of bacteria, even bacteria present at low abundance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other approaches to estimating gene-level expression are possible, including model-based approaches [8,12-14], and methods based on physical models [15,16]. Various methods for estimating probe background intensities have also been proposed, incorporating probe content [17,18] or using physical models [19]. With so many probes interrogating background signal, Exon arrays present the opportunity to fit improved background models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improved detection of pathogenic E. coli (Ogunjimi and Choudary, 1999) by immuno-capture PCR, and the sensitive detection of Salmonella (Hoorfar et al, 2000) and Campylobacter (Nogva et al, 2000) by real-time PCR have also been developed; but these procedures are all monospecific and are either laborious or very expensive for routine use in water testing laboratories. More recent improvements have allowed simultaneous detection of several microorganisms in a single assay (Maynard et al, 2005;Straub et al, 2005;Marcelino et al, 2006). The use of such multiplex polymerase chain reaction (m-PCR) has provided rapid and highly sensitive methods for the specific detection of pathogenic microbes in the aquatic environment (Kong et al, 2002).…”
Section: Methods Used In Detection Of Bacterial Pathogens In Watermentioning
confidence: 99%