Acetamiprid used to preventHylobius abietisdamaging young trees poses a very low risk of causing water contamination provided good forestry practices are followed

Abstract

A study of chemical runoff following the use of acetamiprid as a pre-treatment and top-up spray to prevent damage from the large pine weevil (Hylobius abietis L.) to young trees was undertaken at a restock site in mid-Wales. The site was specifically selected to pose a high risk of chemical runoff, being a high elevation, headwater catchment with stagnopodzol soils, subject to high rainfall. Water samples were collected before, during and after each treatment from six points around the site, as well as from a nearby stream that acted as a control. Only 1 of the 90 water samples collected detected acetamiprid at levels above the limit of quantification of 0.005 μg l−1 (i.e. 0.000000005 g in 1 l of water) and this appeared to be due to wash-off of residues from the plastic bags the trees had been delivered to the site in, which had been temporarily placed within a dry road drain. The recorded concentration of 0.1022 μg l−1 of acetamiprid was low, being only 20 per cent of the Predicted No Effect Concentration (PNEC) of 0.5 μg l−1. Neither of the top-up spray applications resulted in water contamination at any of the sampling points. The results show that the good forestry practice measures employed were effective in preventing contamination of stream waters by acetamiprid. The use of 10-m buffers between forest drains and receiving streams, as per standard good forestry practice in the UK, should be more than adequate to prevent any chemical runoff contaminating watercourses. However, it is recommended that forest practice is further tightened in relation to the placement and handling of planting bags on site. Bags should not be placed within or near road or forest drains, and they should be removed from the site at the end of each day.

Trap Catch Data are Poor Predictors of Damage Caused by Pine Weevil (Hylobius Abietis) to Conifer Seedlings

“…Insecticide treatment is currently still used for seedling protection in several European countries (Hardy et al 2020, Galko et al 2022, Thomas et al 2022, despite serious concerns for the environment and health of forest workers associated with their use (Mian and Mulla 1992, Kolmodin-Hedman et al 1995, Pisa et al 2015. However, in Swedish forestry, protection with insecticides has been almost completely phased out and replaced by stem coatings that provide physical protection for the seedlings, and similar changes in practices can be expected in other countries (Nordlander et al 2009, Skogsstyrelsen, 2021, Luoranen et al 2022).…”