2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2010.09.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acetazolamide-based fungal chitinase inhibitors

Abstract: Graphical abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Different phases of biofilm (8,12, and 24 h), with or without azetazolamide (128 mg/liter; Sigma), a chitinase inhibitor (36), were formed at 37°C either in microtiter plates or in tissue culture flasks as described above. The quantity of eDNA within the ECM was measured using a microplate fluorescence assay (MFA) with a DNA-binding dye (SYBR green I) as previously described (37).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different phases of biofilm (8,12, and 24 h), with or without azetazolamide (128 mg/liter; Sigma), a chitinase inhibitor (36), were formed at 37°C either in microtiter plates or in tissue culture flasks as described above. The quantity of eDNA within the ECM was measured using a microplate fluorescence assay (MFA) with a DNA-binding dye (SYBR green I) as previously described (37).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chitinase has been suggested to play an essential role in the remodeling of the fungal cell wall and hence can serve as an important target for drug design and development. Consistent with this thought, a co-crystal structure of Af ChiA1 with acetazolamide has been used to explore the identification of inhibitors of chitinase as new antifungal agents [101]. There has also been a report of a screening-based discovery of chitinase inhibitors as antifungal agents against Aspergillus fumigatus [102].…”
Section: Fungal Cell Wall As a Drug Development Targetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crystal structures of chitinases with one single GH18 domain have been extensively studied in archaea (Tsuji et al, 2010), bacteria (Perrakis et al, 1994;van Aalten et al, 2000;Songsiriritthigul et al, 2008;Hsieh et al, 2010;Busby et al, 2012;Payne et al, 2012;Madhuprakash et al, 2013;Malecki et al, 2013;Ü stok et al, 2015;Itoh et al, 2016), fungi (Hollis et al, 2000;Rao et al, 2005;Hurtado-Guerrero & van Aalten, 2007;Schü ttelkopf et al, 2010;Yang et al, 2010), plants (Terwisscha van Scheltinga et al, 1994;Cavada et al, 2006;Ohnuma, Numata, Osawa, Mizuhara, Lampela et al, 2011;Ohnuma, Numata, Osawa, Mizuhara, Vå rum et al, 2011;Kitaoku et al, 2015;Masuda et al, 2015;Umemoto et al, 2015), insects Liu et al, 2017) and humans (Fusetti et al, 2002;Olland et al, 2009). Although the overall structure of these GH18 domains is a (/) 8 -barrel with a substrate-binding cleft on the top side, they can be differentiated by the shapes of the substrate-binding clefts and the presence or absence of insertion domains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%