2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-8703(03)00511-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy after coronary angiography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
65
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
65
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…25 Considering all the studies, neither oral nor intravenous NAC should be routinely prescribed for CIN prophylaxis. 26,27 As reported in many studies, we also found that NAC did not confer any benefit over saline alone.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…25 Considering all the studies, neither oral nor intravenous NAC should be routinely prescribed for CIN prophylaxis. 26,27 As reported in many studies, we also found that NAC did not confer any benefit over saline alone.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…However, only 2 patients (0.5%) in our study met criteria for the RISK stage of kidney injury using the RIFLE criteria, and none manifested more advanced kidney injury. This suggests that the use of small changes in Scr to estimate sample size requirements, although helping to ensure a sufficient number of primary study "events," likely results in inadequate power to assess clinically meaningful outcomes (23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28). We conducted post hoc analyses to determine the sample size requirements of a clinical trial testing a hypothetical intervention that would reduce the incidence of CIAKI, from 3.5%, which was the incidence in our study using a definition of an increase in Scr Ն0.5 mg/dl, to 1.75%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oldemeyer et al (103) randomized 96 patients having coronary angiography, all with creatinine clearance Ͻ50 ml/min to treatment with NAC 1500 mg orally every 12 h for four doses or placebo. The definition of RCIN was an increase in Scr of 0.5 mg/dl or 25% compared with the baseline value.…”
Section: Other Negative Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%