2012
DOI: 10.2337/dc11-2190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Achievement of Target A1C Levels With Negligible Hypoglycemia and Low Glucose Variability in Youth With Short-Term Type 1 Diabetes and Residual β-Cell Function

Abstract: OBJECTIVETo determine exposure to hyper- and hypoglycemia using blinded continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) profiles in youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) with residual β-cell function during the first year of insulin treatment.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSBlinded, 3–7 day CGM profiles were obtained in 16 short-term T1D patients (age 8–18 years, T1D duration 6–52 weeks) who had peak C-peptide levels ranging from 0.46 to 1.96 nmol/L during a mixed-meal tolerance test. Results in this short-term group were compared … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In that study, short-term glucose variability assessed with continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) was associated with postprandial beta cell function. Another reported that glucose variability was significantly reduced in youth with short-term type 1 diabetes who retained residual β-cell function than in youth with type 1 diabetes for a longer duration [19]. However, we could not find the studies showing relationships between A1C variability and β-cell function at the time of diagnosis in type 2 diabetes.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…In that study, short-term glucose variability assessed with continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) was associated with postprandial beta cell function. Another reported that glucose variability was significantly reduced in youth with short-term type 1 diabetes who retained residual β-cell function than in youth with type 1 diabetes for a longer duration [19]. However, we could not find the studies showing relationships between A1C variability and β-cell function at the time of diagnosis in type 2 diabetes.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…In the DCCT, maintaining residual C-peptide secretion was associated with a significant decrease in the incidence of severe hypoglycaemia [13]. In a previous study, a good correlation of residual C-peptide secretion with a lower incidence of hypoglycaemic readings on CGM was demonstrated [14]. In that study, 16 participants with recently diagnosed diabetes and measurable C-peptide levels (mean 0.96 ± 0.42 pmol/ml, ranging from 0.46 to 1.96 pmol/ml) had a 0.3% incidence of hypoglycaemia, and a group of individuals with a mean duration of diabetes of 7.6 years and who had similar HbA 1c levels (6.8% [51 mmol/mol]) had a 7.6% incidence of hypoglycaemia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that study, 16 participants with recently diagnosed diabetes and measurable C-peptide levels (mean 0.96 ± 0.42 pmol/ml, ranging from 0.46 to 1.96 pmol/ml) had a 0.3% incidence of hypoglycaemia, and a group of individuals with a mean duration of diabetes of 7.6 years and who had similar HbA 1c levels (6.8% [51 mmol/mol]) had a 7.6% incidence of hypoglycaemia. Of interest, in that study an age-matched control group had 1.7% of their CGM readings < 3.9 mmol/l despite not having diabetes [14], which may be a result of false hypoglycaemic readings obtained with the CGM, which was the same CGM system as used in the current study. In the current study, 76% of CGM downloads from study participants, more than 10% of whom had CGM readings < 3.9 mmol/l, showed significant residual C-peptide levels of 0.57–3.08 pmol/ml resulting in findings of a positive correlation between increased C-peptide levels and a higher incidence of hypoglycaemia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients in the non-RBF group may have higher glucose variability (34), making it difficult to increase the insulin dose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%