2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2012.07.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Achievements and future trends in the analysis of emerging organic contaminants in environmental samples by mass spectrometry and bioanalytical techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
68
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 165 publications
0
68
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The limits of quantitation (LOQs) were 0.04-17 ng/g for PBDEs, and 10-370 ng/g for OPFRs. In most proposed methods, many matrix interferents were co-extracted and coeluted along with PBDEs and OPFRs due to the inherent complexity of dust, even after an additional pre-cleanup by florisil [23][24][25]. Such interferences could possibly lead to an increase in the background in the mass spectrum, decrease instrumental selectivity and sensitivity, and in addition contaminate the GC system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limits of quantitation (LOQs) were 0.04-17 ng/g for PBDEs, and 10-370 ng/g for OPFRs. In most proposed methods, many matrix interferents were co-extracted and coeluted along with PBDEs and OPFRs due to the inherent complexity of dust, even after an additional pre-cleanup by florisil [23][24][25]. Such interferences could possibly lead to an increase in the background in the mass spectrum, decrease instrumental selectivity and sensitivity, and in addition contaminate the GC system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Society uses a vast array of compounds for a range of uses including personal care, food preparation and preservation, medication (human and animal), industrial manufacturing processes and agriculture. A growing number of microorganic contaminants have been found in groundwater resources over the last few decades as analytical techniques have become more affordable and advanced and as awareness of different sources of contaminants has grown (Farré et al, 2012;Lapworth et al, 2012). Many of these are now being detected in urban groundwater across the world (Duong et al, 2015;Jurado et al, 2014;Jurado et al, 2012;Lin et al, 2015;López-Serna et al, 2013;Osenbrück et al, 2007) The sources and pathways for organic micro-pollutants to reach the groundwater include point and diffuse sources and are summarised for an urban settings in Stuart et al (2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UV filters show also a negative effect in the processes of construction and reconstruction of tissues, the efficiency of the immune system, inflammation and DNA damage [133]. (MDMA) 1 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, EME 2 ecgonine methyl ester, EDDP 3 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine, THC-COOH 4 (11-nor-9-carboxydelta9-tetrahydrocannabinol), MDEA 5 ( 3,4-metylenodioksy-Netyloamfetamina), MDA 6 (3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine), THC 7 (tetrahydrocannabinol), BE 8 (benzoylecgonine)…”
Section: Uv Filtersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organic compounds previously not known to be significant in freshwater, in terms of distribution and/or concentration, are now being more widely detected as analytical techniques improve [1]. These compounds, which have the potential to cause known or suspected adverse ecological or human health effects, are often collectively referred to as emerging contaminants (ECs) [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%