2018
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Achieving Accurate Automatic Sleep Staging on Manually Pre-processed EEG Data Through Synchronization Feature Extraction and Graph Metrics

Abstract: Sleep staging, the process of assigning labels to epochs of sleep, depending on the stage of sleep they belong, is an arduous, time consuming and error prone process as the initial recordings are quite often polluted by noise from different sources. To properly analyze such data and extract clinical knowledge, noise components must be removed or alleviated. In this paper a pre-processing and subsequent sleep staging pipeline for the sleep analysis of electroencephalographic signals is described. Two novel meth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
22
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The Orthogonal Discrete Wavelet Transform (ODWT) was applied and the analysis was based on the relative wavelet entropy (RWE) metric. Bi-orthogonal wavelets of 5th order were selected as the family wavelet class (Frantzidis et al, 2010, 2014b; Chriskos et al, 2018). Optimal time-frequency analysis is obtained since the mother wavelet is subjected to scaling and translation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Orthogonal Discrete Wavelet Transform (ODWT) was applied and the analysis was based on the relative wavelet entropy (RWE) metric. Bi-orthogonal wavelets of 5th order were selected as the family wavelet class (Frantzidis et al, 2010, 2014b; Chriskos et al, 2018). Optimal time-frequency analysis is obtained since the mother wavelet is subjected to scaling and translation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AD) was assessed by means of QDA, SVM, and DT. These techniques are widely employed for data classification from EEG recordings (Spyrou et al, 2016 ; Chriskos et al, 2018 ; Ruiz-Gómez et al, 2018 ). In order to compare our results with those of our previous study (Ruiz-Gómez et al, 2018 ), the performances of the models were described by the same statistical measures: accuracy ( Acc ), sensitivity ( Se ), specificity ( Sp ), positive predictive value ( PPV ), and negative predictive value ( NPV ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even the use of semi-automatic scoring, in which the sleep-wake distinctions are made automatically and provide some quality control over the procedure, would also be beneficial and would make this time-consuming process easier. In human PSG data, there are some promising results regarding computer-assisted or automated staging technologies [8][9][10] using a wide range of signal processing methods and algorithms (for a review, see [11]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 13 , 14 ]. However, there is no consensus in the literature about the training process or the feature generation, and most of the studies rely on prior knowledge to compute representative features to effectively characterize EEGs [ 9 , 15 ]. These prevent the generalizability to larger datasets from various patients with different sleep patterns, and the applicability is even more limited in non-human research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%