Achieving equitable uptake of handwashing and sanitation by addressing both supply and demand-based constraints: findings from a randomized controlled trial in rural Bangladesh

Abstract

Background Supply driven programs that are not closely connected to community demand and demand-driven programs that fail to ensure supply both risk worsening inequity. Understanding patterns of uptake of behaviors among the poorest under ideal experimental conditions, such as those of an efficacy trial, can help identify strategies that could be strengthened in routine programmatic conditions for more equitable uptake. WASH Benefits Bangladesh was a randomized controlled efficacy trial that provided free-of cost WASH hardware along with behavior change promotion. The current paper aimed to determine the impact of the removal of supply and demand constraints on the uptake of handwashing and sanitation behaviors across wealth and education levels. Methods The current analysis selected 4 indicators from the WASH Benefits trial— presence of water and soap in household handwashing stations, observed mother’s hand cleanliness, observed visible feces on latrine slab or floor and reported last child defecation in potty or toilet. A baseline assessment was conducted immediately after enrolment and endline assessment was conducted approximately 2 years later. We compared change in uptake of these indicators including wealth quintiles (Q) between intervention and control groups from baseline to endline. Results For hand cleanliness, the poorest mothers improved more [Q1 difference in difference, DID: 16% (7, 25%)] than the wealthiest mothers [Q5 DID: 7% (− 4, 17%)]. The poorest households had largest improvements for observed presence of water and soap in handwashing station [Q1 DID: 82% (75, 90%)] compared to the wealthiest households [Q5 DID: 39% (30, 50%)]. Similarly, poorer household demonstrated greater reductions in visible feces on latrine slab or floor [Q1DID, − 25% (− 35, − 15) Q2: − 34% (− 44, − 23%)] than the wealthiest household [Q5 DID: − 1% (− 11, 8%). For reported last child defecation in potty or toilet, the poorest mothers showed greater improvement [Q1–4 DID: 50–54% (44, 60%)] than the wealthier mothers [Q5 DID: 39% (31, 46%). Conclusion By simultaneously addressing supply and demand-constraints among the poorest, we observed substantial overall improvements in equity. Within scaled-up programs, a separate targeted strategy that relaxes constraints for the poorest can improve the equity of a program. Trial registration WASH Benefits Bangladesh: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT01590095. Date of registration: April 30, 2012 ‘Retrospectively registered’.

Is the burden of anaemia among Indian adolescent women increasing? Evidence from Indian Demographic and Health Surveys (2015–21)

“…Nutrient-rich foods, which are essential for preventing anaemia, may be more accessible to wealthier households, thereby reducing the risk of developing anaemia [ 59 ]. Additionally, wealthier households may have superior sanitation infrastructure, which can help reduce infectious disease rates associated with anaemia [ 60 , 61 ]. Furthermore, wealth can also affect access to healthcare, including preventative measures and treatment for anaemia.…”

WASH interventions and child diarrhea at the interface of climate and socioeconomic position in Bangladesh

“…This shows that implementing WASH that does not generate inequalities would require a tailored approach 29 . Members of our team have previously assessed equity in the WASH Benefits Bangladesh interventions with respect to measures of adherence 30 and others have assessed barriers and inequalities in effective WASH practices in the African setting 24 , 31 . These previous studies have demonstrated improved equity in WASH practices and this present analysis demonstrates that those improvements in equity carry forward to improvements in equity in child diarrhea.…”

Adaptation of Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Interventions: A Model and Scoping Review of Key Concepts and Tools

“…However, adapting these evidence-based interventions to facilitate implementation at-scale in ways that maintain originally demonstrated levels of effectiveness has proved challenging (1-3). These challenges have been attributed in part to poor ability to adapt to context and retain effectiveness as interventions are implemented at scale (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10).…”