2019
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2019.2910552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Achieving Maximum Reliability in Deadline-Constrained Random Access With Multiple-Packet Reception

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Namely, a packet can be correctly received if and only if there is no other packet transmissions during its transmission. However, the new physical (PHY) layer techniques enables a single PHY channel to accommodate multiple concurrent transmissions, which is called multiple-packet reception (MPR) capability [36], [43], [62]. According to our previous research on random access protocols with MPR capability [36], [43], [62], the random access protocol design with MRP is very different from that with SPR.…”
Section: E Mpr Capabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Namely, a packet can be correctly received if and only if there is no other packet transmissions during its transmission. However, the new physical (PHY) layer techniques enables a single PHY channel to accommodate multiple concurrent transmissions, which is called multiple-packet reception (MPR) capability [36], [43], [62]. According to our previous research on random access protocols with MPR capability [36], [43], [62], the random access protocol design with MRP is very different from that with SPR.…”
Section: E Mpr Capabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, we only compare the conventional slotted ALOHA with a p-persistent strategy and conventional CSMA with a uniform backoff strategy in this paper. We also remark that previous studies [15], [43] assumed that the packet size L = 1, i.e., a packet can be delivered in one slot. However, in many applications, the packet size can be large enough such that it cannot be delivered in one slot but needs to be split into multiple slots to finish transmission [47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although it is expected a huge increase in data demand and number of wireless devices, in the literature several works have demonstrated that decentralized wireless networks have scalability problems [2]. Focusing on overcoming theses scalability issues, multiple works including [3,4] have proposed the adoption of MPR techniques to increase the capacity of decentralized wireless networks. Different from Single-packet reception (SPR) techniques, which only allow one reception at a time, MPR PHY layer capability enables multiple packets to be decoded simultaneously at the receiver.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%