Given the importance of environmental compensations and biodiversity offsets (i.e. compensations with no net loss of biodiversity) for conservation and their increasing use worldwide, it is critical to understand and improve these mechanisms. In this work, we sought to broaden our understanding and make suggestions for improvement, focusing on ways to measure and achieve ecological equivalence in compensation trades. First, we reviewed the academic literature on the condition metrics used in offsets. We unraveled and understood the main limitations of the metrics: the frequent lack of incorporation of the three dimensions of equivalence (biodiversity, landscape and ecosystem services), the inclusion of many ecological attributes highly aggregated in a single formula, generating a single value as a final result, and the fact they were developed in few countries, primarily from the Global North -yet, they are commonly applied in other countries, inclusive from the Global South. Thus, our next step was trying to overcome these limitations by developing a new metric. We created the Disaggregated Condition Metric, which presents flexibility in the number and identity of the attributes included, always in a disaggregated way. To make the metric simpler, we tested the synergy and trade-off relationships of the attributes and identified those most redundant that could be dismissed, always including the three dimensions of equivalence. Compensation trades are only allowed within spatial units (hexagons from 5 to 10 thousand hectares) of the same value for the three attributes selected at the end of the tests. Using the tropical biome Atlantic Forest within the state of São Paulo as our study system, these attributes were: bird richness, landscape connectivity, and potential pollination service. The Disaggregated Condition Metric has a high potential to be successfully transposed to other regions, especially those from the Global South. Our final step was to test the metric application in a real situation. For this, we used the Legal Reserve compensation scheme proposed in the Brazilian New Forest Code. Considering the same study area in São Paulo, we calculated for each hexagon values of deficit and surplus of Legal Reserve, areas possibly available for restoration of native vegetation, private areas in an irregular situation within public protected areas, where the compensation could be carried out, and the costs for employing these compensation strategies. We created six scenarios to test the performance of these strategies, always using the Disaggregated Environmental Condition Metric and including ecological equivalence in the trades. We showed that practically the entire deficit of the Atlantic Forest of São Paulo can be compensated by a combination of protection of Legal Reserve surplus with restoration, which is the scenario with the best cost-efficiency, considering the costs, deficit resolution and increase in forest cover (considered here as "additionality"). Therefore, we not only contributed to a better unders...