2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Achieving private conservation targets in Brazil through restoration and compensation schemes without impairing productive lands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the association between public and private reserves, our study area has 38% of native vegetation cover, a percentage close to the minimum threshold (40%) suggested as necessary for the maintenance of native species in tropical agroecosystems (Arroyo-Rodríguez et al 2020), but much higher than the typical pattern of the (Ronquim 2017). The Cerrado of the state of São Paulo stands out nationally as having one of the highest LRs debt and, therefore, a high necessity for vegetation restoration (Freitas et al 2017, Mello et al 2021. Although these private native vegetation areas provide ecosystem services that are key for maintaining biodiversity, human well-being, and agricultural production as well, their restoration still generates conflicts with a parcel of rural owners, who do not agree to bear the restoration costs (Metzger et al 2019, Strassburg et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the association between public and private reserves, our study area has 38% of native vegetation cover, a percentage close to the minimum threshold (40%) suggested as necessary for the maintenance of native species in tropical agroecosystems (Arroyo-Rodríguez et al 2020), but much higher than the typical pattern of the (Ronquim 2017). The Cerrado of the state of São Paulo stands out nationally as having one of the highest LRs debt and, therefore, a high necessity for vegetation restoration (Freitas et al 2017, Mello et al 2021. Although these private native vegetation areas provide ecosystem services that are key for maintaining biodiversity, human well-being, and agricultural production as well, their restoration still generates conflicts with a parcel of rural owners, who do not agree to bear the restoration costs (Metzger et al 2019, Strassburg et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the transaction costs not evaluated in this study are expected to decrease with the property size, additionally burdening small rural properties compared to medium-sized or large properties. Higher restoration costs in small rural areas indicate that large agribusiness companies contribute proportionally less than smallholders to forest restoration commitments when (assisted) NFR is prioritized (Scenario I), although they hold the largest environmental debts (Mello et al, 2021). By contrast, Scenario II distributes restoration opportunity costs more fairly Apart from a better socio-environmental performance, the largescale forest restoration in Scenario II is associated with lower overall restoration costs, and up to 30% of restoration costs may be saved compared to Scenario I, in which more than 8 Mha would be restored.…”
Section: Tree Planting Plus Nfr Increases Environmental Compliance An...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Disaggregated Condition Metric was designed focused on general compensation schemes that include ecological equivalence, such as the volunteer offsets for private lands in South Africa (Von Hase et al, 2010), or the compensations of private reserves in rural properties in Brazil (Mello et al, 2021a(Mello et al, , 2021b. However, it could also attend to more exigent compensation schemes, such as biodiversity offsets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We highlight that the number of hexagons available for compensation should not be a reference through which compensation trades should be evaluated, since ecological equivalence is the main driver to select compensation sites. If the number of candidate hexagons to compensate an impact-hexagon is too low in a given region, compensating in hexagons of one or two classes above the impact-hexagon original classes is an acceptable adaptation of the metric, making it more feasible in operational and economic terms (Mello et al, 2021a(Mello et al, , 2021b. Also, in many cases, extensive databases do not exist or are not readily available due to many factors, e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation