2022
DOI: 10.3982/ecta18773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Achieving Scale Collectively

Abstract: Many firms in developing countries could be too small to adopt modern technology embodied in expensive production machines. This paper shows that rental market interactions allow these small firms to increase their effective scale and mechanize production. We conduct a survey of manufacturing firms in Uganda, which uncovers an active rental market for large machines between small firms in informal clusters. We then build an equilibrium model of firm behavior and estimate it with our data. We find that the rent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While suggestive, this interpretation of the supply side response to a demand shock is consistent with other recent findings. In Uganda, Bassi, Muoio, Porzio, Sen, and Tugume (2022) found that employees in on‐demand manufacturing (e.g., welding, furniture‐making) spend about 25% of time “waiting for customers” or “eating and resting.” More broadly, it relates to the old idea in development economics that it might be possible to expand production without notable price inflation due to the availability of slack capacity. Classic arguments focused on “surplus labor” due to artificially high wages (Lewis (1954)), while here both labor and capital appear to have been under‐utilized due to limited flexibility to scale their employment to match demand.…”
Section: Discussion: Utilization Of Productive Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While suggestive, this interpretation of the supply side response to a demand shock is consistent with other recent findings. In Uganda, Bassi, Muoio, Porzio, Sen, and Tugume (2022) found that employees in on‐demand manufacturing (e.g., welding, furniture‐making) spend about 25% of time “waiting for customers” or “eating and resting.” More broadly, it relates to the old idea in development economics that it might be possible to expand production without notable price inflation due to the availability of slack capacity. Classic arguments focused on “surplus labor” due to artificially high wages (Lewis (1954)), while here both labor and capital appear to have been under‐utilized due to limited flexibility to scale their employment to match demand.…”
Section: Discussion: Utilization Of Productive Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contracting frictions and institutions may also affect local market structure and capacity. For instance, Bassi et al (2022) documented a pattern of small industrial clusters in neighboring Uganda, in which a dozen small carpentry firms producing nearly identical products may co‐exist in the same area. Each of these separately owned firms has one or at most a few employees, and they are characterized by the slack labor capacity noted above.…”
Section: Discussion: Utilization Of Productive Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research into the impact of government procurement systems identifies improved access to financing as an explanatory factor that helps firms to achieve scale economies, a key challenge for improved financial performance and SME growth (Bassi et al, 2022). In a study of financially constrained US firms, Hebous and Zimmerman (2021) finds that increased government demand enables higher levels of capital investment by facilitating access to external financing.…”
Section: Government Procurement and Access To Financingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it has not prevented generalizations about small firms based on tiny samples (for example, La Porta and Shleifer 2016). To see why this can be problematic, consider the work of Bassi et al (2020) on three sectors of urban manufacturing in Uganda with a mix of "small" and large firms. The authors show that the way in which one defines the borders of a small firm matters a lot.…”
Section: The In-between Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%