2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Achieving social change on gender-based violence: A report on the impact evaluation of Soul City's fourth series

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
71
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
71
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Soul City deploys a variety of measurement methods, including quantitative baseline and follow-up surveys, and some qualitative data (Soul City Institute, 2016). An evaluation of a Soul City intervention to address domestic violence found a 14 % increase in agreement with a statement that no woman deserves to be beaten, and the same percentage increase in awareness about a national helpline connecting Soul City audiences to assistance for domestic violence (Hillis et al, 2015;Usdin, Scheepers, Goldstein, & Japhet, 2005). The intervention also correlated with a shift in attitudes, showing a 10% increase in respondents disagreeing that domestic violence was a private affair (Usdin et al, 2005).…”
Section: A Social Ecology Of Causal Factors For Violence Against Chilmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Soul City deploys a variety of measurement methods, including quantitative baseline and follow-up surveys, and some qualitative data (Soul City Institute, 2016). An evaluation of a Soul City intervention to address domestic violence found a 14 % increase in agreement with a statement that no woman deserves to be beaten, and the same percentage increase in awareness about a national helpline connecting Soul City audiences to assistance for domestic violence (Hillis et al, 2015;Usdin, Scheepers, Goldstein, & Japhet, 2005). The intervention also correlated with a shift in attitudes, showing a 10% increase in respondents disagreeing that domestic violence was a private affair (Usdin et al, 2005).…”
Section: A Social Ecology Of Causal Factors For Violence Against Chilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An evaluation of a Soul City intervention to address domestic violence found a 14 % increase in agreement with a statement that no woman deserves to be beaten, and the same percentage increase in awareness about a national helpline connecting Soul City audiences to assistance for domestic violence (Hillis et al, 2015;Usdin, Scheepers, Goldstein, & Japhet, 2005). The intervention also correlated with a shift in attitudes, showing a 10% increase in respondents disagreeing that domestic violence was a private affair (Usdin et al, 2005). Soul City evaluations assessing some of its multimedia programs that include youth as a target audience show increases in HIV/AIDS knowledge and condom use among youth (Soul City Institute, 2016).…”
Section: A Social Ecology Of Causal Factors For Violence Against Chilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, analysts have hypothesized Regardless of whether or not evidence on the effectiveness of community mobilization strategies (e.g., public events and advocacy campaigns) to reduce violence remains limited, these strategies appear to have changed attitudes towards gender and violence. This is essential in order to build on violence reduction approaches (Usdin et al, 1982;Michau et al, 2014).…”
Section: Social Prevention Of Violence In Youth and Against Womenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yoksulluk ve düşük sosyoekonomik statü sorunları daha da fazla artırmaktadır. [11] Uluslararası bağlamda kadını şiddetten koruyan yasal çerçeve, mekanizma ve politikalar konusunda büyük ilerlemeler kaydedilmiş olmasına rağmen, bu yasa ve standartların etkin bir şekilde uygulanmasında hala sıkıntılar yaşanmaktadır. Cinsiyete dayalı şiddet Birleşmiş Milletlerin, hükümetlerin, sivil toplum kuruluş-larının (STK), uygulayıcıların ve toplum temelli kuruluşların katılımı ile çok yönlü bir sorumluluğu gerektirmektedir.…”
unclassified