1998
DOI: 10.1080/13674589800200030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Achieving staff development through understanding the learner

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These mental processes are embedded into four distinct yet interactive learning patterns, identified by Johnston as sequential (structure and organization), precise (accuracy and details), technical (independence and problem solving), and confluent (intuition and risk-taking). The interactive learning model is an effective model for application in group learning settings (Marcellino, 2000), as the learner's individual Learning Connections Inventory scores become the basis for dialogue between student and facilitator and among students, resulting in the development of a very powerful learning community in which each learner feels that he or she is a contributing member within a collaborative environment (Johnston & Johnston, 1998).…”
Section: Metacognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These mental processes are embedded into four distinct yet interactive learning patterns, identified by Johnston as sequential (structure and organization), precise (accuracy and details), technical (independence and problem solving), and confluent (intuition and risk-taking). The interactive learning model is an effective model for application in group learning settings (Marcellino, 2000), as the learner's individual Learning Connections Inventory scores become the basis for dialogue between student and facilitator and among students, resulting in the development of a very powerful learning community in which each learner feels that he or she is a contributing member within a collaborative environment (Johnston & Johnston, 1998).…”
Section: Metacognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that, the LML Process does not classify or categorize the child in one of the patterns mentioned, but emphasizes that all children use each of these interactive procedures together to a certain level (Johnston & Dainton, 1997). The LML Process is based on the assumption that taking control of the successfulness of pre-school activities and school learning is a powerful and positive learning experience (Osterman & Kottkamp, 2004;Flavell et al, 2000;Johnston and Johnston, 1998) that helps a child to take responsibility for success in pre-school activities/school learning by using carefully developed activities including the metacognitive strategy, which has been developed by children and which guides them through problem situations. The LML Process offers an opportunity for a dialog between a child and an educator as well as a child and another child i.e.…”
Section: Theoretical Basementioning
confidence: 99%
“…a student and a teacher and a student and another student, resulting with the development of a very strong community in which the kindergarten activity i.e. school learning takes place and where each child feels to contribute to a cooperative environment as a member of the educational group or a class (Johnston & Johnston, 1998). Silverberg ( 2002) calls this the relational development area.…”
Section: Theoretical Basementioning
confidence: 99%