WHAT'S KNOWN ON THIS SUBJECT: Preterm infants can be successfully resuscitated with ,100% oxygen (O 2 ); however, initiation with room air remains controversial. Current Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) guidelines suggest using air or blended O 2 to titrate O 2 to meet target preductal saturation goals.
WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS:This is the first trial to compare a limited O 2 strategy to target NRP-recommended transitional goal saturations versus a high O 2 strategy in preterm infants. The limited O 2 strategy decreased integrated excess oxygen and oxidative stress and improved respiratory outcomes. abstract OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a limited oxygen strategy (LOX) versus a high oxygen strategy (HOX) during delivery room resuscitation decreases oxidative stress in preterm neonates.
METHODS:A randomized trial of neonates of 24 to 34 weeks' gestational age (GA) who received resuscitation was performed. LOX neonates received room air as the initial resuscitation gas, and fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO 2 ) was adjusted by 10% every 30 seconds to achieve target preductal oxygen saturations (SpO 2 ) as described by the 2010 Neonatal Resuscitation Program guidelines. HOX neonates received 100% O 2 as initial resuscitation gas, and FIO 2 was adjusted by 10% to keep preductal SpO 2 at 85% to 94%. Total hydroperoxide (TH), biological antioxidant potential (BAP), and the oxidative balance ratio (BAP/TH) were analyzed in cord blood and the first hour of life. Secondary outcomes included delivery room interventions, respiratory support on NICU admission, and short-term morbidities.RESULTS: Forty-four LOX (GA: 30 6 3 weeks; birth weight: 1678 6 634 g) and 44 HOX (GA: 30 6 3 weeks; birth weight: 1463 6 606 g) neonates were included. LOX decreased integrated excess oxygen (+FIO 2 3 time [min]) in the delivery room compared with HOX (401 6 151 vs 662 6 249; P , .01). At 1 hour of life, BAP/TH was 60% higher for LOX versus HOX neonates (13 [9-16] Dr Kapadia conceptualized and designed the study, recruited patients, and designed the data collection instruments; participated in collecting the data, analysis of the data, and interpretation of data; and drafted the initial manuscript, wrote the last draft of the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted. Dr Chalak participated in concept, design, analysis, and interpretation of data; reviewed and revised the manuscript; and approved the final manuscript as submitted. Dr Sparks participated in recruitment, design, analysis, and interpretation of data; and reviewed and approved the final manuscript as submitted. Mr Allen participated in design, data collection, and analysis of data; and reviewed and approved the final manuscript as submitted. Dr Savani participated in concept, design, analysis, and interpretation of data; and critically reviewed and approved the final manuscript as submitted. Dr Wyckoff participated in conceptualization and design of the study; supervised the recruitment, designing of data, and collection instruments; participated in analysis...